
Cebs advises on options and national discretions in the CRD
Level 3 EU committee publishes proposals to include additional criteria in the Capital Requirements Directive on national discretions
Following Cebs' advice regarding the reduction of such options and discretions published in October 2008, the European Commission requested further technical advice on eight national discretions and on an additional group relating to real estate, "where more granularity, criteria or impacts is needed, should those options be removed or transformed into a general rule".
The short time period was not long enough for a public consultation or to conduct an impact assessment, but Cebs has confirmed that it requested industry input on the national discretions and on the recognition of other unfunded credit protection for dilution risk, as these discretions were highlighted as being of special interest for some parts of the industry in the first Cebs advice.
CEBS proposes to include additional criteria in the respective provisions in the Capital Requirements Directive on the national discretions on the treatment of high-risk items and on the recognition of other physical collateral. It suggests the national discretions on the recognition of other unfunded credit protection for dilution risk and on the recognition of receivables as collateral be kept, and that further work be conducted on the remaining discretions for which further technical advice was sought (that is, on the adequate percentages to calculate potential future credit exposures, on guidance to harmonise the treatment of entities as 'public sector entities', on the appropriate treatment of covered bonds, on prudence of the treatment of real estate as collateral and on guidance to harmonise the treatment of eligible 'short-term exposures').
Click here for the full CEBS paper.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
CCP models vulnerable to Trump risk
Volatility of ‘will he, won’t he’ tariff strategy could confound clearing house risk models
CME-FICC cross-margin extension timeline questioned
SEC changes and queries around margin segregation may make end-2025 deadline unrealistic
Op risk data: Crypto hack bites Bybit; fat-finger flurry at Citi
Also: OKX gets AML scold, UK motor finance fiasco revs up. Data by ORX News
PTFs clash with banks over ‘done-away’ US Treasury clearing
Trading firms losing patience with banks’ reluctance to unbundle trading and execution
Iosco chief defends margin transparency standards
More reporting will improve financial system’s resilience, argues Rodrigo Buenaventura
Credit loss database reveals holes in Basel’s IRB formula
Researcher has used two decades of data to propose improved internal model methodology
Market knee-jerks keep VAR models on their toes
With a return to volatility, increased backtesting exceptions show banks’ algos are stretched
Why the survival of internal models is vital for financial stability
Risk quants say stampede to standardised approaches heightens herding and systemic risks