Cebs advises on options and national discretions in the CRD
Level 3 EU committee publishes proposals to include additional criteria in the Capital Requirements Directive on national discretions
Following Cebs' advice regarding the reduction of such options and discretions published in October 2008, the European Commission requested further technical advice on eight national discretions and on an additional group relating to real estate, "where more granularity, criteria or impacts is needed, should those options be removed or transformed into a general rule".
The short time period was not long enough for a public consultation or to conduct an impact assessment, but Cebs has confirmed that it requested industry input on the national discretions and on the recognition of other unfunded credit protection for dilution risk, as these discretions were highlighted as being of special interest for some parts of the industry in the first Cebs advice.
CEBS proposes to include additional criteria in the respective provisions in the Capital Requirements Directive on the national discretions on the treatment of high-risk items and on the recognition of other physical collateral. It suggests the national discretions on the recognition of other unfunded credit protection for dilution risk and on the recognition of receivables as collateral be kept, and that further work be conducted on the remaining discretions for which further technical advice was sought (that is, on the adequate percentages to calculate potential future credit exposures, on guidance to harmonise the treatment of entities as 'public sector entities', on the appropriate treatment of covered bonds, on prudence of the treatment of real estate as collateral and on guidance to harmonise the treatment of eligible 'short-term exposures').
Click here for the full CEBS paper.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
Review of 2025: It’s the end of the world, and it feels fine
Markets proved resilient as Trump redefined US policies – but questions are piling up about 2026 and beyond
BofA urges horizontal CCP fix after CME outage, others demur
Analysts say clearing meltdown bolsters case for futures-for-futures exchange with FMX
One in five banks targets a 30-day liquidity survival horizon
ALM Benchmarking research finds wide divergence in liquidity risk appetites, even among large lenders
Bank ALM tech still dominated by manual workflows
Batch processing and Excel files still pervade, with only one in four lenders planning tech upgrades
Many banks ignore spectre of SVB in liquidity stress tests
In ALM Benchmarking exercise, majority of banks have no internal tests focusing on stress horizons of less than 30 days
Quant Finance Master’s Guide 2026
Risk.net’s guide to the world’s leading quant master’s programmes, with the top 25 schools ranked
ALM Benchmarking: explore the data
View interactive charts from Risk.net’s 46-bank study, covering ALM governance, balance-sheet strategy, stress-testing, technology and regulation
Staff, survival days, models – where banks split on ALM
Liquidity and rate risks are as old as banking; but the 46 banks in our benchmarking study have different ways to manage them