Credit rating agencies under scrutiny again
McCreevy and the CESR discuss how credit rating agencies should treat structured finance products
BRUSSELS – the Committee of European Securities Regulators (CESR) held more talks with the European Union’s internal markets commissioner, Charlie McCreevy, on September 11. The CESR’s 2006 questionnaire of credit rating agencies and the recent subprime mortgage crisis have placed the agencies’ conduct and role under increased scrutiny. McCreevy has asked the CESR to further analyse the process that agencies use to rate structured finance products.
The CESR has been asked to consider a number of conflict-of-interest issues revealed by the 2006 report. The report suggests that interaction and negotiation between rating analysts and arrangers in the design of structured financial products presents an obvious conflict of interest. The independence of the rating process is further compromised by issuers’ payment for ratings. So the CESR is assessing the agencies’ adherence to the Iosco Code of Conduct Fundamentals for Credit Rating Agencies and the effectiveness of the code in addressing conflicts of interest in securitisation and structured credit.
The transparency of the methodologies employed to produce the agencies’ credit ratings is also under scrutiny. This particularly concerns the assumptions by which the methodologies operate, whether they can be improved, and whether investors are sufficiently warned of their limitations. Provisions were discussed for the publication of reviews for all structured finance ratings.
Also under analysis is the agencies’ ability to keep pace with the rapid evolution of the complex structured finance market and the growth of securitisation issues over the past decade. The quality, status and timing of rating decisions are also being reviewed.
McCreevy has asked the CESR to consult the US Securities & Exchange Commission in addition to its meeting with the credit rating agencies at the beginning of October. He has also requested the CESR’s preliminary views and policy advice on these points before the release of its 2008 annual report in April of the role of agencies and their compliance with the Iosco Code.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
Review of 2025: It’s the end of the world, and it feels fine
Markets proved resilient as Trump redefined US policies – but questions are piling up about 2026 and beyond
BofA urges horizontal CCP fix after CME outage, others demur
Analysts say clearing meltdown bolsters case for futures-for-futures exchange with FMX
One in five banks targets a 30-day liquidity survival horizon
ALM Benchmarking research finds wide divergence in liquidity risk appetites, even among large lenders
Bank ALM tech still dominated by manual workflows
Batch processing and Excel files still pervade, with only one in four lenders planning tech upgrades
Many banks ignore spectre of SVB in liquidity stress tests
In ALM Benchmarking exercise, majority of banks have no internal tests focusing on stress horizons of less than 30 days
Quant Finance Master’s Guide 2026
Risk.net’s guide to the world’s leading quant master’s programmes, with the top 25 schools ranked
ALM Benchmarking: explore the data
View interactive charts from Risk.net’s 46-bank study, covering ALM governance, balance-sheet strategy, stress-testing, technology and regulation
Staff, survival days, models – where banks split on ALM
Liquidity and rate risks are as old as banking; but the 46 banks in our benchmarking study have different ways to manage them