A call for common sense
I'M SITTING HERE in London on a Thursday afternoon, listening to the sirens outside the window. Because it's Thursday, everyone tenses – ever so slightly – when one wails by. We've had bomb attacks on public transport on two previous Thursdays in July, so this is hardly surprising.
The British, of course, have been here before. Terrorist bombs have been going off in London since the 1970s. And so have we – the Risk Waters Group, which Incisive Media acquired two years ago, lost members of staff at the top of the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001.
Responding to these events is tricky. On one hand, people want to get on with their lives – the Brits are particularly good at this. On the other, many want to invest large sums in both belts and braces to prevent a repetition – an approach that many US firms have taken.
As an American expat, I'd like to take a mid-Atlantic view on business continuity planning. Such acts of terrorism are meant to disrupt. As a result, it seems to me that financial services firms – whose existence affects so many people – have a moral obligation to minimise disruption. But individuals also have an obligation to conduct their lives without 'fear' being a primary, or even a secondary, motivator.
Clarity of purpose and common sense – they are powerful weapons.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
Pioneers split over future of UK’s digitalised market
Tokenisation provider urges industry to stop waiting for magic to make digitally issued securities possible
Forward volatility: a model-free framework for hedging options risk
A model-free approach to extracting, hedging and managing forward volatility risk
What happens when AI gets good at your risk management job?
Risk executive Alex Golbin asks how to build a valuable career in risk as agentic AI takes on more analysis
ERM’s influence is growing as its ranks are shrinking
Risk Benchmarking: Mandates expanding to include new threats like AI and geopolitical risk, but majority report flat to down headcount
Why AI agents are like staff you can’t trust
Uncertainty implicit in GenAI systems means risk managers have to take a more adversarial approach
Regulatory risk aversion contributed to SVB failure – Bowman
Supervisors ‘knew, or should have known’ about risks a year before bank’s collapse, says Fed vice-chair
As LLMs spread, quants confront ‘lexical risk’
Users are finding the uncertainty in GenAI models is hard to measure
Risk managers go softly-softly on AI adoption
ERM teams still in testing mode for most AI use cases, latest Risk Benchmarking study shows