A little respect
First, a bit of gloating. The April edition noted that there was a serious risk of Basel II deadlines being pushed back in the US and Europe, and now that looks as it has come to pass, at least in the US ( see related article, in this issue )
I have also had several rather kind notes about last month’s editorial, on the relationship between Rousseau and Basel II. I must confess that it was the product of a debate I had with a colleague after drinking far too much red wine while at a conference in Madrid, so am glad that my ramblings made some sense.
This month’s thought? At the risk of sounding like I am shamelessly pandering to Operational Risk’s readership, I’d like to say I am surprised at just how under-appreciated op risk managers seem to be. Our third annual op risk survey, sponsored by consulting firm Protiviti, shows that although more and more responsibility is being placed on the shoulders of op risk managers, the funding that should be coming through to help them meet this increased burden doesn’t seem to be in place.
And in our monthly survey, we asked if operational risk managers’ "board of directors understand operational risk to the level of sophistication you consider appropriate?" The answer was a resounding ‘no’ – 78.6% answered that way.
Should we initiate an annual ‘Operational Risk Respect Day’? Thoughts welcome, as always…
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
Bank ALM tech still dominated by manual workflows
Batch processing and Excel files still pervade, with only one in four lenders planning tech upgrades
Many banks ignore spectre of SVB in liquidity stress tests
In ALM Benchmarking exercise, majority of banks have no internal tests focusing on stress horizons of less than 30 days
Quant Finance Master’s Guide 2026
Risk.net’s guide to the world’s leading quant master’s programmes, with the top 25 schools ranked
ALM Benchmarking: explore the data
View interactive charts from Risk.net’s 46-bank study, covering ALM governance, balance-sheet strategy, stress-testing, technology and regulation
Staff, survival days, models – where banks split on ALM
Liquidity and rate risks are as old as banking; but the 46 banks in our benchmarking study have different ways to manage them
CME faces battle for clients after Treasuries clearing approval
Some members not ready to commit to 2026 start date; rival FICC enhances services
AI and the next era of Apac compliance
How Apac compliance leaders are preparing for the next era of AI-driven oversight
Responsible AI is about payoffs as much as principles
How one firm cut loan processing times and improved fraud detection without compromising on governance