Exclusive survey shows “reality gap”
There is a substantial gap between expectations and reality when it comes to the short-term benefits of putting an operational risk management framework in place. This gap is clearly shown in the results of an exclusive survey conducted by Operational Risk in partnership with SAS, the US-based enterprise- wide software provider.
Click here to view the survey (PDF).
Adobe Acrobat PDF files
You will need Adobe Acrobat Reader to view this PDF. This software is available for free from the Adobe web site. Click on the image below to download a free copy.
Copyright statement
As a subscriber, the PDF you are about to view is made available for personal use only. Under the following terms you are granted permission to view online, print out, or store on your computer a single copy, provided this is intended for the benefit of the individual user. Should you wish to use multiple copies of this article, please contact Customer Services.
© Incisive Media Investments Ltd 2004. All rights reserved. No parts of this publication may be reproduced, stored in or introduced into any retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior written permission of the copyright owners.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
Japanese megabanks shun internal models as FRTB bites
Isda AGM: All in-scope banks opt for standardised approach to market risk; Nomura eyes IMA in 2025
Benchmark switch leaves hedging headache for Philippine banks
If interest rates are cut before new benchmark docs are ready, banks face possible NII squeeze
Op risk data: Tech glitch gives customers unlimited funds
Also: Payback for slow Paycheck Protection payouts; SEC hits out at AI washing. Data by ORX News
The American way: a stress-test substitute for Basel’s IRRBB?
Bankers divided over new CCAR scenario designed to bridge supervisory gap exposed by SVB failure
Industry warns CFTC against rushing to regulate AI for trading
Vote on workplan pulled amid calls to avoid duplicating rules from other regulatory agencies
Top 10 op risks: Change brings challenges as banks splash the cash
Higher interest margins and a trend toward insourcing drive major tech projects
Top 10 op risks: deepfakes drive rise in fraud fears
External fraud re-enters top 10 as artificial intelligence provides new tools for criminals
Should the ECB stress-test counterparty default risks?
The US Fed already does, but it is notable that EU banks were less exposed to Archegos
Most read
- Top 10 operational risks for 2024
- Filling gaps in market data with optimal transport
- Japanese megabanks shun internal models as FRTB bites