Germany does not guarantee savings accounts
Contrary to media speculation, Germany will not guarantee savings
BERLIN – After a weekend of press speculation and rumour, it appears Germany will not guarantee all private savings accounts. Chancellor Merkel’s comments that German investors would not lose were not a committal to formal guarantees, according to the BBC website.
Speculation of a guarantee, which would have been worth around €500 billion (£390 billion), followed schemes by Ireland, Greece and Denmark. It prompted a UK Treasury plea for confirmation over the weekend, and placed pressure on UK prime minister Gordon Brown to follow suit. German regulator Bafin has described media reports as “misleading”.
German chancellor Angela Merkel and finance minister Peer Steinbrück announced the success of plans to rescue German lending bank Hypo Real Estate in Berlin on Sunday. The state-led bail-out has cost €50 billion of mostly government money. The deal was pushed through by the German government after the first rescue attempt faltered when German banks rejected the deal. Steinbrück said Hypo – Germany’s fourth largest bank – was too big to fail.
In a statement on Bafin’s website, the regulator said: “The risk-shielding strategy, which was agreed last weekend by the German financial sector in consultation with Bafin and the Bundesbank, has the objective of enabling the HRE [Hypo Real Estate] Group to eliminate its liquidity difficulties and re-size its risk positions.”
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
CROs shoulder climate risk load, but bigger org picture is murky
Dedicated teams vary wildly in size, while ownership is shared among risk, sustainability and the business
ISITC’s Paul Fullam on the ‘anxiety’ over T+1 in Europe
Trade processing chair blames budget constraints, testing and unease over operational risk ahead of settlement move
Climate Risk Benchmarking: explore the data
View interactive charts from Risk.net’s 43-bank study, covering climate governance, physical and transition risks, stress-testing, technology, and regulation
‘The models are not bloody wrong’: a storm in climate risk
Risk.net’s latest benchmarking exercise shows banks confronting decades-long exposures, while grappling with political headwinds, limited resources and data gaps
Cyber insurance premiums dropped unexpectedly in 2025
Competition among carriers drives down premiums, despite increasing frequency and severity of attacks
Op risk data: Kaiser will helm half-billion-dollar payout for faking illness
Also: Loan collusion clobbers South Korean banks; AML fails at Saxo Bank and Santander. Data by ORX News
Market doesn’t share FSB concerns over basis trade
Industry warns tougher haircut regulation could restrict market capacity as debt issuance rises
CGB repo clearing is coming to Hong Kong … but not yet
Market wants at least five years to build infrastructure before regulators consider mandate