APRA releases risk requirements for general insurers
Australian regulator out with consultation package on internal model-based method for calculating general insurers’ capital requirements
SYDNEY – The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has released a consultation package that sets out its draft prudential requirements for the use of the internal model-based method (IMB method) of determining the minimum capital requirements for general insurers.
The package consists of a draft prudential standard, a prudential practice guide and a related discussion paper. The draft Prudential Standard GPS 113, Capital Adequacy: Internal Model-based Method, reflects developments in relation to the use of internal models that have occurred since APRA's internal model requirements for general insurers were first introduced in 2002. It also follows the principles and concepts developed for internal models in authorised deposit-taking institutions under the Basel II Framework. There are, however, differences of detail and emphasis because the nature and significance of the risks in the two industries are not the same. APRA's proposed approach is also consistent with the guidelines issued by the International Association of Insurance Supervisors, which supports the use of internal models for determining regulatory capital requirements.
APRA member John Trowbridge said a key element of APRA's supervision is to encourage better risk management, and that the use of internal models to assess risk and economic capital can be a valuable tool for this. “The underlying purpose of allowing an insurer to determine its minimum capital requirement based on its internal model is to have capital requirements that better reflect the nature and extent of risks in the insurer's particular business structure and business mix. From a supervisory perspective, the objective is for insurers to understand and manage their risks better, and thereby reduce the risk of failure.”
Comments are requested by August 15, 2008. APRA intends to release the final prudential standards implementing the IMB method for general insurers at the same time as its final prudential standards for the supervision of consolidated general insurance groups. Both the packages are expected to be released in the fourth quarter of 2008 and will become effective on January 1, 2009.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
JSCC faces pushback on plans to merge futures default funds
Members say commodities products should be kept fully segregated because of different risk profile
CME aims to offer client UST cross-margining internally in 2027
CCP has filed initial proposal with SEC; wants to offer more products than joint FICC programme
Manuela Veloso on how banks can make their AI dreams reality
Former JP Morgan head of AI research says open-ended enquiry will unlock technology’s full potential
The ECB’s geopolitical stress test needs a price
Only a market can say how much it should cost to insure against losses from a geopolitical risk event, and none exists, argues academic
Risk managers grapple with hazards and benefits of intraday repo
Expected increase in collateral velocity and re-use could also boost leverage and risk in markets
Repo tokens won’t be cleared. Or will they?
Uncertainty lingers over clearing status of tokenised Treasuries, with decision likely devolved to DTCC
Op risk data: Japanese restaurant payments firm swallows $700m loss
Also: Bank of Baroda fraud filing, Wells’ Ponzi woes, and Swedbank’s Panama Papers payout. Data by ORX News
ECB finds gaps in geopolitical stress-testing frameworks
Current methods fail to properly capture impact of geopolitical stress on liquidity