CEBS consultation on commodities businesses reveals risk areas
CEBS also releases a preliminary document on large-exposure regimes
A consultation by a group of EU banking supervisors on issues arising from trade in commodities has identified market, operational, legal and liquidity risk as possible problem areas.
The Committee of European Banking Supervisors’ (CEBS) consultation, published on June 15, also said that no generalisations can be made regarding systemic risk.
CEBS said: “Systemic risk crystallises through contagion transmitted via market participants' direct and indirect interdependencies. While the perceived interconnections may give rise to systemic risk concerns, their extent may depend on the size of the respective markets for commodities or exotic derivatives, relative to the wider financial market or the related industry.”
The report is a response to the EU Commission’s request, made in August 2006, for the organisation to assess commodities risk. CEBS has also stated that counterparty credit quality should not matter when assessing the level of risk involved in large exposures.
The Committee said: “CEBS’s preliminary view is that, given the nature of unforeseen event risk, counterparty creditworthiness should not be reflected in these limits.”
The statement coincides with the committee’s announcement on June 15 that it would begin a public consultation on the regulation of large exposures. The consultation will consider issues such as the importance of counterparty credit quality and the 800% aggregate large-exposures limit.
It has released a preliminary document detailing the CEBS’s stance on some of the most important concepts involved in the large-exposures regime. The committee has invited the public to submit comments up until August 15.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
Op risk data: FIS pays the price for Worldpay synergy slip-up
Also: Liberty Mutual rings up record age bias case; Nationwide’s fraud failings. Data by ORX News
Banks hold 73% of liquidity buffer in cash and Level 1 assets, on average
Largest lenders hold highest share of central bank reserves in buffer, latest analysis shows
EBA supports global op risk taxonomy, but it won’t happen soon
New EU framework designed to ease adoption by banks; other jurisdictions have different priorities
Allocating financing costs: centralised vs decentralised treasury
Centralisation can boost efficiency when coupled with an effective pricing and attribution framework
EVE and NII dominate IRRBB limit-setting
ALM Benchmarking study finds majority of banks relying on hard risk limits, and a minority supplementing with early-warning indicators
Banks split over AI risk management
Model teams hold the reins, but some argue AI is an enterprise risk
Collateral velocity is disappearing behind a digital curtain
Dealers may welcome digital-era rewiring to free up collateral movement, but tokenisation will obscure metrics
New EBA taxonomy could help integrate emerging op risks
Extra loss flags will allow banks to track transversal risks like geopolitics and AI, say experts