CROs mean more debt, says study

New Angles

It is fashionable for both large financial and non-financial companies to appoint chief risk officers (CROs). But a recently published study suggests that a new CRO might be a sign of weakness rather than strength. The study1, by Robert Hoyt and André Liebenberg of the Terry College of Business at the University of Georgia, was based on an analysis of 26 companies across the US that had announced the appointment of a new CRO. Using a logistic regression analysis to compare the financial

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

To continue reading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: