Insurers grapple with Solvency II economic capital projections

- Clive Davidson
- 08 Jan 2013

Tweet
Facebook
LinkedIn
Save this article
Send to
Print this page

One of the major distinctions between Pillar I and Pillar II of Solvency II is that the first takes a snapshot of the here and now, while the latter looks more towards the future. The quantification requirements of Pillar I are based on a ‘time-zero’ balance sheet, with own funds and capital calculated to meet obligations over the next 12 months, whereas the Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (Orsa) of Pillar II is forward-looking and covers the business planning period.

With many insurers still

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/

If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net

You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/

If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net