Comment: Practical considerations are compromising Solvency II methodology
Fudging the issue
Solvency II (SII) is intended to be an economically rigorous, principle-based capital requirements framework. It aspires to apply market-consistent valuation methods to an insurer’s liabilities and principle-based stochastic methods for assessing one-year 99.5th Value-at-Risk solvency capital. However, the process of transforming Solvency II from a set of high-level principles into a workable regulatory system now appear to have resulted in compromises in the emerging methodology. As a
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Solvency II
Regulation
French resolution may lead EU to adopt US-style rules for PFOF
German and Czech proposals would also put kibosh on commission’s mooted ban on the practice
Receive this by email