Simplistic nature of Solvency II standard formula gives regulatory arbitrage potential

As the industry calls for less complexity in Solvency II, some are arguing the directive is already dangerously simplistic

johnhibbert-b-hibbert

The overly simplistic nature of the standard formula approach tested by the fifth quantitative impact study (QIS 5) leaves open the possibility for regulatory arbitrage, particularly for annuity providers, according to a leading UK-based actuarial consultancy.

A key simplification was the absence of a volatility shock, which was withdrawn from QIS 5 at the last moment by the Committee for European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Supervisors (Ceiops). A second example is the adoption of a

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

Register

Want to know what’s included in our free membership? Click here

This address will be used to create your account

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here