Solvency II: op risk standard approach capital too high under QIS5, says UK insurer

Carlos Montalvo, Ceiops

Proposed capital charges for the standard approach to operational risk are calibrated at too high a level compared with those for insurers using internal models, under the fifth quantitative impact study (QIS5) for the Solvency II directive, according to a risk manager at one UK insurance firm.

"The standard formula comes out higher than the internal model capital," says Kevin Barrett, interim head of risk at life and incapacity insurer Unum UK. "Logically that is correct, but if we look at the

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here:

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

To continue reading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: