Learning from Basel's mistakes

Regulators are looking again at the Basel II Accord in an attempt to incorporate the lessons learned from the financial crisis. What have Solvency II rule-makers learned from the Basel experience? Joel Clark investigates

risk-090301-14-gif

Basel II has been the subject of much criticism since the financial crisis took hold in 2007. The regulatory capital framework has been hauled back under the spotlight, under the premise it failed to ensure banks had adequate capital in place to prevent collapse or government bail-outs. The Basel Committee is revising the Accord to enforce better management of market, credit and liquidity risks by banks, with a greater focus on trading book risks, contingent liabilities and stress testing.

While

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here