Building a capital plan

Basel II

pg63-table-gif

Generally, banks have made good progress in implementing the number-crunching requirements of Pillar I of the Basel II capital framework, but are further behind in addressing the more subjective and management-process aspects of Pillar II, which covers supervisory review. Part of this is caused by the need for the quantitative risk teams to be able to present their analysis in very simple, intuitive terms to a broader audience, so it can be used more actively by the board and the business

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

To continue reading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: