Why FRTB model test loves volatility, but hates hedges

Crucial P&L test for internal models easier to pass if price swings are large, or desks poorly hedged

Bankers might flinch at the very mention of its name. The profit-and-loss attribution (PLA) test, part of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision’s trading book capital rules, is a vital hoop trading desks must jump through to benefit from lighter capital requirements.

The PLA test is the gateway to using internal models for market risk capital calculations, instead of a tougher regulator-set sensitivities-based approach (SBA). But bank simulations suggest the test is difficult to pass

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

If you already have an account, please sign in here.

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: