FRTB 2.0: lower capital but high running costs

Revisions to market risk rules fail to ease complexities of internal models approach

When global standard-setters first revealed their planned revamp of trading book capital rules, bankers responded with furrowed brows. The new regime was dizzyingly complex, costly to implement and, worse, packed a huge capital hit.

Several consultation periods later, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision has released its latest – and supposedly final – version of the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book. The good news for banks? The capital impact is lower. The bad news? The rules are

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

To continue reading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: