Banks will not use NSFR to judge funding risk

Calibration of ratio looks “somewhat insane” when applied to real world, conference hears

jars of money - saving - Getty.jpg
NSFR calculations may look less accurate over time as banking business models change

Bankers say they have little intention of using new rules governing structural liquidity as a framework for judging their economic risks internally, because the calibration is too poor to be helpful. The Basel net stable funding ratio (NSFR) was supposed to enter into force this year, but neither the European Union nor the US have completed their national drafting of the regulation.

“I wouldn’t personally look at NSFR to judge the funding structure of any bank,” said Damian Harland, global head

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

To continue reading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: