EU lawmaker wants cost-benefit analysis of rejecting a CCP

Hübner says adaptation period may follow decision to deny recognition to non-EU clearing house

cost-benefit-risk_Getty-web.jpg
Strict criteria: Hübner calls on Esma and ECB to analyse any decision to deny recognition to a non-EU clearing house

Any decision to deny recognition to a non-European Union clearing house must be based on a cost-benefit analysis, says a top member of the European Parliament, adding to suggestions from the other two EU decision-making bodies that strict criteria will govern any move to relocate euro clearing away from London.   

Under June proposals from the European Commission, third-country central counterparties (CCPs) could be barred from servicing EU firms if they are deemed particularly systemically

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

To continue reading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: