Stress tests ignored CRE threat – Congress
US banks face hundreds of billions of dollars in losses on commercial real estate loans, a danger that was missed by the Capital Adequacy Program (Cap) stress tests in early 2009.
The Congressional Oversight Panel for the Troubled Asset Relief Program, in a report issued in January, predicted that banks could see up to $300 billion in losses on their commercial real estate portfolios, and warned the threat this poses to the US financial system was completely overlooked by the Cap.
Between now and 2014, “$1.4 trillion in commercial real estate loans will reach the end of their terms. Nearly half are at present underwater”, the report said.
The panel pointed out the bulk of commercial real estate losses would come after the expiry of the Tarp – already being wound down and set to expire on October 3. It warned “the size of the commercial real estate market means that its disruption could also have ripple effects throughout the broader economy, prolonging the financial crisis”.
In addition, although the bulk of the losses will come in 2011 and later, the stress tests only examined banks’ capital adequacy under two stress scenarios up to the end of 2010. Furthermore, the stress tests looked only at 19 major banks; while the heaviest burden of the commercial real estate collapse will fall on small and medium-sized lenders, who have half the total system exposure to commercial real estate, despite having only 15% of total assets.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
‘European SEC’ no silver bullet for growth
EU policymakers hope a single, centralised supervisor will help rev up Europe’s economy but critics are mustering
Permanent FRTB reforms seen as vital for IMA adoption
Temporary relief granted in June has done little to encourage internal model use in Europe
How to ensure the next Credit Suisse or SVB fails ‘well’
Regulators are planning changes to resolution rules after criticism that living wills were ignored in previous bank collapses
Asian firms waiting on exemptions from UST clearing mandate
Hoping for relief on extraterritoriality, 51% of Apac firms have yet to start compliance programmes
Already under FRTB, some banks hope for modelling reprieve
Risk Live: BMO and UBS opted for SA, but believe regulators could still opt to follow softer US rules
Regulators better prepared for next Credit Suisse, says SRB head
FSB strengthening guidance on international co-operation, but EU needs more mutual support
From Pillar to Pillar… to post: where now for op risk in Europe?
Experts think enhanced Pillar 2 charge informed by Dora would be more useful than a blunt Pillar 1
PRA struggles to follow Fed’s FRTB modelling moves
Market risk experts say minor differences in US rules add up to more incentives for IMA adoption