Evaluating the policy implications of the other two pillars of Basel II

It reviews and critiques their fundamental features and reaches three conclusions. First, the supervisory-process pillar provides too much scope for supervisory discretion and almost no support for a rules-based approach to regulation that arguably would be much more effective in promoting bank safety and soundness. Second, the market-discipline pillar's information-disclosure guidelines represent a useful first step for many nations with less-developed banking systems, but these costly guid

To continue reading...

You must be signed in to use this feature.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an indvidual account here: