Editor's letter
While financial institutions in the private sector work together in pursuit of a solution to the liquidity problem dogging the markets, the Chancellor of the Exchequer continues to pour money into Northern Rock: public exposure to the ailing bank now stands at £40 billion, taking emergency lending via the Bank of England and the state's guarantee of deposits together. Alistair Darling, it appears, is hoping a private buyer will appear and take the problem out of his hands, but even the favoured bid by Virgin does not envisage final repayment to the Bank within the next two years. As a going concern, entire in itself, it still looks like the Rock's days could be numbered if this latest bid fails.
Turning to the private sector, which has clearly decided that Northern Rock is too risky a bet unless it comes cheaply, genuine attempts are being made to negotiate the fallout from this summer's volatility. It is not clear if the so-called 'super conduit' M-LEC will be a sufficiently robust intervention to reverse the declining fortunes of the structured investment vehicle (SIV) market, but at least the banks involved are directing their best efforts at finding a solution.
In November members of the Treasury Select Committee distinguished themselves by being overheard condemning representatives of the credit rating agencies as "all foreigners". The ensuing questioning was scarcely more enlightened in parts, as it became clear that the MPs on the Committee weren't entirely familiar with what rating agencies actually do. Maybe they should turn their attentions closer to home.
- Matthew Attwood, Editor.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
EBA seeks to allay Simm divergence concerns
EU validator pledges to co-ordinate with global regulators, but retains ability to act alone “if needed”
FRTB models find salvation in US Basel III proposal
Changes to P&L attribution test and NMRFs make IMA viable for US banks, risk managers say
US blows the floors off Basel III
Barr criticises “downward deviations” in US rule; Bowman rejects “blind adherence” to global standards
Basel III endgame – a timeline
A review of Risk.net’s coverage of the US implementation saga
Leaked EU plans offer extra temporary relief for FRTB models
Risk factors would need only two observations to be modellable. Do changes foreshadow US Basel III?
Iosco chief talks cyber, AI and clearing
Buenaventura discusses Iosco’s role in aiding market resilience and cross-border co-operation
US regulators bid to save FRTB IMA, but it’s no small task
Even if industry wish-list is granted, a 2028 start date might be too soon for model adoption
Hopes rise for cross-product netting under SA-CCR
Banks want rule change in Basel III endgame to lower capital costs of clearing UST repos