China releases derivatives guidelines
China’s banking regulator has finally published its long-awaited derivatives guidelines, bringing to an end 18-months of stop-start consultations with the banking sector and removing some of the legal uncertainties that have plagued the country’s derivatives market.
Under the new guidelines – first mooted as a draft consultation document in July 2002, before disappearing from view until last October, when new draft guidelines were published – financial institutions will be able to trade foreign currency-denominated interest rate, credit and currency derivatives on behalf of clients and on their own account once they have received approval from the country’s regulator, the China Banking Regulatory Commission (CBRC).
In a change from the October draft guidelines, the finalised regulations stipulate that financial institutions can use their own assets to conduct ‘profit-oriented’ transactions, an inclusion which will radically change the scope of the Chinese derivatives market. Under the current regulatory framework, derivatives transactions can only be used for hedging and cannot be used for speculative purposes, a rule that has been in place since 1995. In last October’s draft, this was changed to allow banks to conduct ‘arbitrage-like’ transactions, a phrase felt to be too narrow by some observers.
“The fact that it talks of profit-oriented is better than arbitrage, because with arbitrage, it could be interpreted that banks are still not able to take any market risk,” says Chin-Chong Liew, a partner at law firm Allen & Overy in Hong Kong. “Now it’s profit-oriented it seems to indicate that so long as your purpose is to make profits, then you should be able to take market risk.”
Elsewhere, the regulations confirm risk management and personnel requirements outlined in the previous drafts. Licensed institutions must have sound risk management and internal control systems, along with an accounting system for derivatives transactions. In addition, the dealer must ensure the derivatives product is suitable for that client, does not exceed its risk appetite and meets its objectives. In a change from the October draft, however, the final document elaborates on what information that bank needs in order to fulfil its due diligence obligations.
While the new rules come into effect next month, there is a six-month transition period during which financial institutions can apply for licences. “Until the end of that six-month period, life goes on as normal and you can rely on existing rules,” adds Liew.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Regulators better prepared for next Credit Suisse, says SRB head
FSB strengthening guidance on international co-operation, but EU needs more mutual support
From Pillar to Pillar… to post: where now for op risk in Europe?
Experts think enhanced Pillar 2 charge informed by Dora would be more useful than a blunt Pillar 1
PRA struggles to follow Fed’s FRTB modelling moves
Market risk experts say minor differences in US rules add up to more incentives for IMA adoption
Lifeline keeps Europe’s hopes afloat for single-sided reporting
Despite Esma’s proposal for delegated reporting of trades, the industry may yet get its wish
EU’s plan to get competitive faces big legislative hurdles
Large and controversial legislative package may be too amorphous to deliver results quickly
FDIC relearns SVB lessons in resolution tinkering
Paring back requirements gets thumbs up from some, but concerns linger
Stablecoin consortia may be ‘interim’ step to solo bank issuance
Former Citi payments head and Ubyx founder says all G-Sibs will issue their own coins
Report once: will Esma’s €1bn reforms deliver the full picture?
Critics say plan to merge three reporting regimes will see scant returns, and won’t mesh with single-sided reporting