No sign of single EU banking regulator
BRUSSELS – The European Commission (EC) will not push to create a single EU banking regulator over the next five years, according to a green paper on financial services policy issued in mid-May. Other EU organisations, including the European Central Bank, have hinted strongly that they would like to see all the national regulators consolidate into a single, region-wide body to more effectively promote economic and regulatory integration. This discussion has emerged partly as a result of the implementation of Basel II, which requires closer co-ordination among banking supervisors around the world. But the EC has said in its green paper that it would rather work with existing structures to promote convergence of supervisory practices over time than set up a new pan-European regulatory structure.
"The Commission makes a valid point in calling for the current framework and existing tools to be maximized before new structures are even considered," said José María Roldán, chairman of the Committee of European Banking Supervisors (CEBS), at a conference in Brussels in late May. "From the CEBS perspective, and despite our achievements over the past 16 months, we do not yet feel that we have reached the limits of the possibilities afforded to us by the Lamfalussy structure. We will continue to
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Revealed: the three EU banks applying for IMA approval
BNP Paribas, Deutsche Bank and Intesa Sanpaolo ask ECB to use internal models for FRTB
FCA presses UK non-banks to put their affairs in order
Greater scrutiny of wind-down plans by regulator could alter capital and liquidity requirements
Industry calls for major rethink of Basel III rules
Isda AGM: Divergence on implementation suggests rules could be flawed, bankers say
Saudi Arabia poised to become clean netting jurisdiction
Isda AGM: Netting regulation awaiting final approvals from regulators
Japanese megabanks shun internal models as FRTB bites
Isda AGM: All in-scope banks opt for standardised approach to market risk; Nomura eyes IMA in 2025
CFTC chair backs easing of G-Sib surcharge in Basel endgame
Isda AGM: Fed’s proposed surcharge changes could hike client clearing cost by 80%
UK investment firms feeling the heat on prudential rules
Signs firms are falling behind FCA’s expectations on wind-down and liquidity risk management
The American way: a stress-test substitute for Basel’s IRRBB?
Bankers divided over new CCAR scenario designed to bridge supervisory gap exposed by SVB failure