QIS5 results show US right to worry
BASEL AND LONDON – The results of quantitative impact study five (QIS5), released in June, left one US regulator proclaiming that he had been correct to be cautious after the QIS4 results showed wide swings in regulatory capital requirements as a result of the implementation of Basel II. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision members, on the other hand, firmly stuck to their guns and said no adjustments would be made to Basel II as a result of QIS5.
The QIS4 results – which focused only on the advanced internal ratings-based approach under credit risk as that is the only approach being allowed in the US by banks implementing Basel II – showed a 12.5% decline in required capital.
Meanwhile, the QIS5 results for the A-IRB approach showed a 7.1% decline for G-10 Group 1 banks, while G-10 Group 2 banks showed a whopping 26.7% decline. EU banks in
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Dispute emerges over ‘ambiguity’ of perp markets
Kalshi execs hit back at report’s findings of regulatory fogginess
EBA brainstorming ways to make capital rules competitive
Watchdog aims to provide advice on future revisions before year-end
FRTB revamp won’t restore models to past glory, risk managers say
US-inspired reform only expected to lead to small boost in adoption, with limited desks on IMA
Regulators must think bigger to tackle tech risks, says Hong Kong SFC
Leung warns AI adoption and recent cyber scares show new threats require global co-operation
Time to let some air out of the banking system?
Watchdogs worry about lowering standards, but policy-makers eye growth – they face a difficult dilemma
Competitiveness mandate for Esma faces uphill battle
European Parliament offers last chance to force Esma to take more nuanced approach
Europe expects FRTB to bite on XVA hedges
Risk Benchmarking: One-third of European dealers fear new market risk rules will have major effect on hedges
Burning ambition: will Europe join the US in setting fire to the rules?
As the US dismantles post-crisis regulations, some think Europe will follow in a bid to boost economic growth
