Further delays hit US Basel II implementation
WASHINGTON, D.C. – The US process for Basel II was thrown into chaos yet again by the passage of a new law on the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation that includes provision for a one-year study. The net effect of the legislation is said to be the delay of the publication of the notice of proposed rulemaking for Basel II until late 2006.
The new law requires the Comptroller General to report to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives "on the potential impact on the financial system of the United States of the implementation of the new Basel Capital Accord (Basel II) and the proposed revisions to current reserve requirement regulations for non-Basel II banks".
The report will focus on whether there would be a reduction in capital requirements; "whether Basel II could hinder enforcement of prompt corrective action laws and regulations"; and "the potential implications any changes in capital requirements may have on the safety and soundness of the financial system in the United States".
The paper is also to report on the costs of Basel II, "the feasibility and appropriateness of Basel II's statistical models", and "the ability of regulators to oversee capital requirement operations of financial institutions".
Also under study is the ability of supervisors to attract and retain sufficient expertise, conduct the necessary oversight of capital and risk modelling.
The news, which will disappoint many large financial services firms in the US as well as financial services regulators from other jurisdictions, comes as the US regulators finally released the results of the fourth quantitative impact study. The results had originally been scheduled to be published in April 2005. OR&C
Oprisk & ComplainceOnly users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Double, but no trouble? CVA capital hit may lack clout
Industry opinion mixed around Basel III endgame derivatives charge
Amid debanking drama, banks try to say ‘no’, safely
A basic risk management tool – the ability to turn a customer away – has become a political football
Erba myth: will US banks choose new capital measure?
B3E gives US banks a dilemma – adopt expanded risk-based approach, or a new standardised alternative
Illiquid assets pricing still needs expert judgement, say banks
EU regulators want more transparency in valuations, but some asset prices remain elusive
Fed to move tailored-capital goalposts soon, says Bowman
Banks hope agencies will index triggers for harsher capital rules to economic growth
Will SEC reporting proposal supercharge alt data providers?
Move that would allow companies to opt out of quarterly reporting disclosures welcomed
EU lawmaker calls for review of Luxembourg’s cross-border rules
Grand Duchy accused of side-stepping rules aimed at prising away banking business from London
Un-American or un-JPM? Surcharge rethink divides G-Sibs
Some see sense in rethink to funding indicator, others call for a backtrack