MoU between EU/EEA and Swiss supervisors on insurance supervision agreed
The Committee of European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Supervisors (CEIOPS) and the Federal Office of Private Insurance (FOPI) have released a memorandum of understanding (MoU) designed to facilitate information exchange between the EU/EEA Insurance Supervisors, which are all members or observers of CEIOPS, and the Swiss Supervisor.
It is hoped that by taking into account the nature of the group relationship of insurance or financial conglomerates, more effective and prudential supervision will be possible. The MOU states that an efficient co-operation between the competent authorities of the relevant countries is essential for achieving supervisory objectives, while minimising the administrative burden for the supervisory entities.
The MoU provides the legal basis for including FOPI in the work of the Coordination Committees (Co-Cos) that have been established under the umbrella of the Helsinki Protocol. Co-Cos have been established for each trans-national insurance group and comprise the national supervisors engaged in the day-to-day supervision of the entities of the relevant group.
“A Pan European insurance market requires the co-operation of supervisors beyond the borders of the EU,” the chairman of CEIOPS, Henrik Bjerre-Nielsen, said. “CEIOPSconsiders this MoU as the basis for building further co-operation with the Swiss Supervisory Authority.”
Click here for a copy of the MoU.
BaselAlert.comOnly users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Amid debanking drama, banks try to say ‘no’, safely
A basic risk management tool – the ability to turn a customer away – has become a political football
Erba myth: will US banks choose new capital measure?
B3E gives US banks a dilemma – adopt expanded risk-based approach, or a new standardised alternative
Illiquid assets pricing still needs expert judgement, say banks
EU regulators want more transparency in valuations, but some asset prices remain elusive
Fed to move tailored-capital goalposts soon, says Bowman
Banks hope agencies will index triggers for harsher capital rules to economic growth
Will SEC reporting proposal supercharge alt data providers?
Move that would allow companies to opt out of quarterly reporting disclosures welcomed
EU lawmaker calls for review of Luxembourg’s cross-border rules
Grand Duchy accused of side-stepping rules aimed at prising away banking business from London
Un-American or un-JPM? Surcharge rethink divides G-Sibs
Some see sense in rethink to funding indicator, others call for a backtrack
Bank of England softens tone on CCP cross-product margining
Breeden supports margin efficiencies to encourage more repo clearing, but still warns on leverage