Lessons in liquidity II

Following the interview with the Monetary Authority of Singapore on the critical issue of liquidity risk management in the July issue, this month the spotlight falls on the Sydney-based Australian Prudential Regulatory Authority. By Christopher Jeffery

asiarisk-aug08-21-gif

Asia Risk: Should liquidity risk be explicitly included in regulatory capital - that is, brought explicitly into the Basel II framework?

Australian Prudential Regulatory Authority: The Basel Committee and most national regulators, including the Australian Prudential Regulatory Authority (Apra), have previously issued guidance and requirements for liquidity risk management, which are still valid today, although in need of some updating and strengthening. Pillar 2 of Basel II identifies liquidity

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here