Tighten oversight and loosen mark-to-market rules, Basel Committee says
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision has warned supervisors to improve their supervision of banks' risk models, but has also echoed calls for a relaxation in mark-to-market accounting rules.
In a consultation paper released on November 28, the committee warned banks and supervisors to ensure that valuations were checked by a separate unit within the bank, rather than by the unit responsible for trading the positions, and said that larger risk provisions would be enforced.
But, it added, regulators should also look more closely at relaxing strict mark-to-market rules under certain circumstances, considering whether markets are sufficiently liquid, whether prices are the result of forced sales, and whether the product being valued is sufficiently similar to the product traded in the market. The proposals will be open for comment until February 6.
The committee follows the lead of other regulators and industry bodies which have hinted at loosening of mark-to-market requirements in recent weeks: in October the US Securities and Exchange Commission re-emphasised the rules on ignoring mark-to-market in illiquid markets, and the governments of the eurozone countries made similar recommendations later the same month.
See also: European governments promise loan guarantees and bank restructuring
SEC to ease mark-to-market rules
US banks call for more leeway on mark-to-market rules
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Market players warn against European repo clearing mandate
Regulators urged to await outcome of US mandate and be wary of risks to government bond liquidity
Esma won’t soften regulatory expectations for cloud and AI
CCP supervisory chair signals heightened scrutiny of third-party risk and operational resilience
BPI says SR 11-7 should go; bank model risk chiefs say ‘no’
Lobby group wants US guidance repealed; practitioners want consistent model supervision and audit
Esma supervision proposals ensnare Bloomberg and Tradeweb
Derivatives and bonds venues would become subject to centralised supervision
Industry frowns on FCA’s single-sided trade reporting efforts
Buy side warns UK attempt to ease Mifir burden may miss target; dealers aren’t happy either
One vision, two paths: UK reporting revamp diverges from EU
FCA and Esma could learn from each other on how to cut industry compliance costs
Market doesn’t share FSB concerns over basis trade
Industry warns tougher haircut regulation could restrict market capacity as debt issuance rises
FCMs warn of regulatory gaps in crypto clearing
CFTC request for comment uncovers concerns over customer protection and unchecked advertising