Aquila cuts staff to stave-off rating downgrade
Aquila, the Missouri-based energy trader, has cut 200 jobs across its merchant services energy risk management division. A total of 150 of the cuts are in its Kansas City head office, 43 are across its other North American offices and seven will affect Aquila’s European operations.
“Every market is still well covered, and when you consider that we employ 1,172 people in this division across the US, the cuts are negligible,” said the spokeswoman. “The whole energy industry is being challenged post-Enron, but I want to make it clear that the cuts were in no way related to the Federal Energy Regulatory Committee (Ferc) investigations.”
"We have completed a review of our trading practices for any evidence of the use of trading strategies identified by the Ferc and outlined in the Enron memos under review," Ed Mills, Aquila merchant service's president and chief operating officer said a statement released earlier this week.
"Our review indicates our trading activities during this time period were proper and in full compliance with the regulations and standards issued by the Ferc. We have found no evidence that Aquila conducted any of the identified Enron trading strategies.”
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Erba myth: will US banks choose new capital measure?
B3E gives US banks a dilemma – adopt expanded risk-based approach, or a new standardised alternative
Illiquid assets pricing still needs expert judgement, say banks
EU regulators want more transparency in valuations, but some asset prices remain elusive
Fed to move tailored-capital goalposts soon, says Bowman
Banks hope agencies will index triggers for harsher capital rules to economic growth
Will SEC reporting proposal supercharge alt data providers?
Move that would allow companies to opt out of quarterly reporting disclosures welcomed
EU lawmaker calls for review of Luxembourg’s cross-border rules
Grand Duchy accused of side-stepping rules aimed at prising away banking business from London
Un-American or un-JPM? Surcharge rethink divides G-Sibs
Some see sense in rethink to funding indicator, others call for a backtrack
Bank of England softens tone on CCP cross-product margining
Breeden supports margin efficiencies to encourage more repo clearing, but still warns on leverage
UK securitisation reforms trump EU’s, say market players
Originators and investors could find UK securitised assets easier to deal with after tandem reviews