FSA 2008 outlook focuses on SocGen bonus lessons
The Financial Services Authority (FSA) has urged investment banks to re-examine their attitudes towards annual staff bonuses in the wake of last week's record rogue-trading loss at Société Générale.
"There are indications that remuneration charges are not necessarily adjusting commensurately with falls in banking earnings. More fundamentally, there is a concern over whether investment banks' [bonus] policies provide the right incentives for risk assessment," the regulator wrote.
"The size of bonuses can be a powerful incentive for staff to focus on the quantity of business they undertake during a year and pay less attention to its quality. There is a concern that in some cases remuneration policies can work against the systems and controls that have been put in place to control risk," the FSA stated.
The regulator's comments could be interpreted as a direct allusion to the €4.9 billion rogue-trading loss divulged last week by Société Générale. According to Jean-Claude Marin, the prosecutor leading the case against Jerome Kerviel, the 31-year old trader took €60 billion of unauthorised positions on SocGen's equities derivatives desk because he wanted to qualify for a €300,000 annual bonus.
Among other issues highlighted in the report, the FSA noted an increase in the ratio of net value at risk (VAR) to investment banks' tangible equity over recent months, indicating increasing risk is the business environment.
"Unlike previous years, the rate of increase of VAR exceeded the increase in investment banks' tangible equity and by August 2007 the VAR/equity ratio had reached levels not seen since early 2002," the FSA notes.
The regulator predicts that VAR will continue to increase as the impact of last year's market turbulence feeds through the trading cycle.
See also:Shake-up at SG follows rogue trader losses
"He didn't want to tell the truth immediately"
Questions remain over SG rogue trader
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
EBA proposes drastic overhaul to supervisory data reporting
Revamp will cut back the number of datapoints and integrate overlapping reports
CFTC wants to regulate prediction markets. Is it up to the task?
Former officials echo state gambling authorities’ concerns over agency’s ability to police betting risks
EBA seeks to allay Simm divergence concerns
EU validator pledges to co-ordinate with global regulators, but retains ability to act alone “if needed”
FRTB models find salvation in US Basel III proposal
Changes to P&L attribution test and NMRFs make IMA viable for US banks, risk managers say
US blows the floors off Basel III
Barr criticises “downward deviations” in US rule; Bowman rejects “blind adherence” to global standards
Basel III endgame – a timeline
A review of Risk.net’s coverage of the US implementation saga
Leaked EU plans offer extra temporary relief for FRTB models
Risk factors would need only two observations to be modellable. Do changes foreshadow US Basel III?
Iosco chief talks cyber, AI and clearing
Buenaventura discusses Iosco’s role in aiding market resilience and cross-border co-operation