
JP Morgan says downgrade will impact derivatives business
Rating agencies Standard & Poor’s (S&P) and Fitch have lowered JP Morgan Chase’s long-term credit rating from AA to AA-. The rating agencies acted after JP Morgan Chase warned that it expects third-quarter earnings to be well below the second quarter. The bank cited a weak trading performance and losses on loans to telecom and cable companies.
In a conference call to credit analysts today, S&P analyst Tanya Azarchs said she was “very disturbed” by the “uncharacteristic” trading performance of JP Morgan Chase. Azarchs said JP Morgan Chase told S&P it had lost money from proprietary trading and that this was “not from one big position but several”. She would not comment on the nature of these deals. JP Morgan Chase offered no comment either.
S&P analysed JP Morgan Chase’s derivatives portfolio and found it had $43 billion of net collateral counterparty exposure. “This is a high number,” said Azarchs. “But the ratings are not altogether disturbing. It tends to be relatively high quality,” she added.
Azarchs warned that if JP Morgan Chase is downgraded again it would have a significant effect on its derivatives trading business. “It would put the bank as a counterparty on derivatives, for example, out of the A range,” she said.
One US bank analyst suggested that S&P was giving JP Morgan Chase “too much slack” by not being tough enough on the firm. But Azarchs replied: “It’s important to keep it in perspective. It is still profitable, and we expect [JP Morgan Chase] to be profitable in every quarter of this year.”
William Harrison, chief executive of JP Morgan Chase, said yesterday he was disappointed with his bank’s results. “As much as we have focused on reducing credit portfolio concentrations in recent years, it is clear that further reductions are necessary, and we will continue to address that issue as an integral part of our credit policies.”
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
EU banks ‘will play for time’ in stand-off over India’s CCPs
Lawyers say banks are unlikely to set up subsidiaries and will instead pin hopes on revised Emir fix
ECB mulls intervention on uneven banking book reporting
Inconsistency among EU banks on whether deposits and loans are in scope for credit spread risk
Iosco warns of leveraged loan ‘vulnerabilities’
As recovery rates plummet, report calls for clearer covenants and more transparency on addbacks
Narrow path to compromise on EU’s post-Brexit clearing rules
Lawmakers unlikely to support industry demand to delete Emir active accounts proposal altogether
The Fed’s stress test models are inaccurate. Something has to change
First step for US regulator to improve its bank loss forecasts would be to open up its models to public scrutiny, argue two banking industry advocates
Bankers call for overhaul of EBA stress tests
Support for multiple scenarios, but only if fixed assumptions and variables are scaled back
CFTC plan to relax MMF margin restriction sparks debate
Industry welcomes proposal to lift ban on repo-using funds as eligible IM, but some warn MMFs bring risks
Legal challenges loom for renewed US focus on Sifis
Lawyers say any FSOC attempt to designate systemic non-banks risks a repeat of MetLife case