
JP Morgan accuses WestLB on $165m Enron swap
JP Morgan officials declined to comment beyond what is contained in the lawsuit. But people familiar with the situation said that Enron came to the bank with the insurance already lined up. JP Morgan would not have entered into the deals with the now-bankrupt energy trader except had it not been for the surety bonds, these sources added.
Marc Shapiro, head of risk management at the bank, held a conference call Thursday. “Obviously this was a surprise to us because we expected [the surety bonds and l/c] to be promptly paid,” Shapiro said. “It is our expectation that we will ultimately be paid on these,” he added.
The fallout from the insurers’ alleged non-payment could further damage multiline insurers’ attempts to expand their financial market business. Many believe the Hollywood Funding case earlier this year, in which a subsidiary of AIG refused to pay on a contract backing some film finance bonds, set a bad precedent. Speaking at Risk magazine’s Alternative Risk Strategies conference in September, Tobey Russ, president of Chubb Financial Solutions, said, “The film finance deals have been a stumbling block for the whole industry.”
Indeed, during Thursday’s conference call, JP Morgan’s Shapiro said the firm was reviewing its use of surety bonds as collateral and that it would be unlikely to use them in the future.
JP Morgan’s share of the disputed insurance payment is $965 million. The insurance contracts were payable today; the letter of credit was payable at an earlier date. WestLB officials were not immediately available for comment.
The lawsuit names the following insurance companies: Hartford Fire Insurance, Liberty Mutual Insurance, Safeco Insurance Company of America, St Paul Fire and Marine, Continental Casualty, Fireman’s Fund Insurance (an Allianz subsidiary), Federal Insurance (a Chubb subsidiary), Lumberman’s Mutual (a Kemper subsidiary), Travelers Indemnity and Travelers Casualty and Surety.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email [email protected]
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email [email protected]
More on Regulation
Risk management
Nasdaq whacked with $36 million fine over Aas default
Swedish regulator’s fine poses serious questions over default management and margining, while providing few answers
Receive this by email