JP Morgan accuses WestLB on $165m Enron swap
JP Morgan Chase has accused WestLB of failing to make payment on a $165 million letter of credit (l/c) backing an Enron-related swap. JP Morgan Chase made the dispute public, though it did not name West LB, instead merely referring to “a European financial institution”, yesterday. A person familiar with the situation said the l/c provider was WestLB.
JP Morgan officials declined to comment beyond what is contained in the lawsuit. But people familiar with the situation said that Enron came to the bank with the insurance already lined up. JP Morgan would not have entered into the deals with the now-bankrupt energy trader except had it not been for the surety bonds, these sources added.
Marc Shapiro, head of risk management at the bank, held a conference call Thursday. “Obviously this was a surprise to us because we expected [the surety bonds and l/c] to be promptly paid,” Shapiro said. “It is our expectation that we will ultimately be paid on these,” he added.
The fallout from the insurers’ alleged non-payment could further damage multiline insurers’ attempts to expand their financial market business. Many believe the Hollywood Funding case earlier this year, in which a subsidiary of AIG refused to pay on a contract backing some film finance bonds, set a bad precedent. Speaking at Risk magazine’s Alternative Risk Strategies conference in September, Tobey Russ, president of Chubb Financial Solutions, said, “The film finance deals have been a stumbling block for the whole industry.”
Indeed, during Thursday’s conference call, JP Morgan’s Shapiro said the firm was reviewing its use of surety bonds as collateral and that it would be unlikely to use them in the future.
JP Morgan’s share of the disputed insurance payment is $965 million. The insurance contracts were payable today; the letter of credit was payable at an earlier date. WestLB officials were not immediately available for comment.
The lawsuit names the following insurance companies: Hartford Fire Insurance, Liberty Mutual Insurance, Safeco Insurance Company of America, St Paul Fire and Marine, Continental Casualty, Fireman’s Fund Insurance (an Allianz subsidiary), Federal Insurance (a Chubb subsidiary), Lumberman’s Mutual (a Kemper subsidiary), Travelers Indemnity and Travelers Casualty and Surety.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
EBA guidance prompts banks to rethink CSRBB perimeters
Banks will likely have to expand their credit spread risk coverage following recommendations
Market players warn against European repo clearing mandate
Regulators urged to await outcome of US mandate and be wary of risks to government bond liquidity
Esma won’t soften regulatory expectations for cloud and AI
CCP supervisory chair signals heightened scrutiny of third-party risk and operational resilience
BPI says SR 11-7 should go; bank model risk chiefs say ‘no’
Lobby group wants US guidance repealed; practitioners want consistent model supervision and audit
Esma supervision proposals ensnare Bloomberg and Tradeweb
Derivatives and bonds venues would become subject to centralised supervision
Industry frowns on FCA’s single-sided trade reporting efforts
Buy side warns UK attempt to ease Mifir burden may miss target; dealers aren’t happy either
One vision, two paths: UK reporting revamp diverges from EU
FCA and Esma could learn from each other on how to cut industry compliance costs
Market doesn’t share FSB concerns over basis trade
Industry warns tougher haircut regulation could restrict market capacity as debt issuance rises