
Basel regulators still hoping for 2005 date
German Bundesbank president, Ernst Welteke, said in a mid-February newspaper interview that the new rules, which will determine how much reserve capital major banks must set aside to guard against banking risks, probably won’t take effect until 2006.
The Basel Committee declined to comment on Welteke’s remarks. But other regulators say much depends on whether a key survey seeking information on how Basel II could affect banks can be sent out to banks on June 1.
If that date is achieved, then it is a reasonable bet that the third and final consultative paper on Basel II – CP3 – can be issued by the end of this year for comment by the banking industry. That will enable the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, the architect of Basel II and the body that in effect regulates international banking, to issue its final version of the Accord in the first half of next year.
That should still allow time for national legislation to be passed where necessary, and for banks to get their systems up to scratch by 2005, regulators said.
But they agreed that if the timetable slips further, then 2006 becomes the likeliest date.
The Capital Task Force, the highest level sub-grouping of the Basel Committee, meets on March 11, and the Committee itself meets the next day in an effort to resolve problems.
Supervisors are concentrating on agreeing a policy for treating asset securitisation and loans to small- to medium-sized companies within the credit risk provisions of the Accord – the issues that have held up progress in recent months.
Delays have been a feature of the Basel II story. The Basel Committee last year postponed the Accord’s coming into effect by a year to 2005 while hoping to issue CP3 early this year. In December it was decided new research in the form of QIS3 was needed, and that CP3 would be issued around mid-year. The complexity of the task then resulted in further delays.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
SEC criticised for belt-and-braces ban on volume-based pricing
Legal experts question need for rules to prevent firms disguising agency trades as proprietary
SEC expected to protect CRT in conflicts of interest rule
Decision could come as early as today; high hopes for credit risk transfer exemption
FRTB managers face hard facts about risk factors
There are ways to reduce the capital charges caused by NMRFs, but they come at a price
SEC official defends delayed dealer registration rule
Regulator says market should be treated like equities, but PTFs warn it will harm market liquidity
New UK clearing rules: same as the old rules?
Clearing experts doubt UK regulation can diverge significantly from Emir and global standards
SEC to delay US Treasury clearing mandate, dealer rule
A final vote on proposed US Treasury market reforms is now expected in early 2024
BoE warns against use of stablecoins in banking
Tokenised payment systems pose compliance and systemic risks, regulator says
Industry unsure of SEC’s new short-selling transparency rule
Requirement aims to provide sufficient transparency while protecting traders from a GameStop-style backlash