JP Morgan CDS exposure could top $10 trillion
JP Morgan’s proposed acquisition of Bear Stearns could push the bank’s already formidable footprint in the credit default swaps (CDS) market through the $10 trillion notional barrier, raising questions over the prudence of such large concentrations within a single firm.
JP Morgan already has $7.9 trillion of CDS contracts outstanding, more than twice that of Citi, the second largest player in the market, which has $3 trillion outstanding. Bear Stearns holds a share somewhere below this, and although it was unable to confirm the exact size of its CDS business, analysts estimate it has as much as $2.5 trillion in swaps outstanding.
Should the sum be added to JP Morgan’s own CDS book, the resulting $10.4 trillion volume would constitute just under a quarter of the credit derivatives market, estimated at $45.46 trillion in notional outstanding as of June 2007 by the International Swaps and Derivatives Association. The prospect of a single institution acting as counterparty for almost 25% of outstanding CDS trades has raised fears about extreme concentrations within the market.
Last month, analysts at Barclays Capital calculated that the failure of a dealer with $2 trillion in CDS contracts outstanding would lead to losses of between $36 billion and $47 billion for counterparties in those trades. JP Morgan analysts stress, however, that its CDS receivable mark-to-market exposure – a method they insist is a more reasonable measure of risk – is just $22 billion.
Some participants suggest the idea of a $10 trillion notional CDS exposure is far-fetched, and that a significant proportion of Bear Stearns’ outstanding CDSs would be netted against offsetting JP Morgan trades.
“JP Morgan will take Bear Stearns’ CDS inventory onto its inventory and then net it down against other trades it has on its own book,” says Lars Toomre, president of Connecticut-based financial engineering consultancy Toomre Capital Markets. “All outstanding swaps between JP Morgan and Bear Stearns will immediately be unwound, but there will also be CDS trades with other counterparties that both firms have in effect, and they too will have to be taken off. A lot of netting is likely to go on with such a big book of business, especially since those CDS contracts will probably be concentrated among the 20 US banks that serve as primary dealers.”
In the last week of March, after news broke of JP Morgan’s increased $1.2 billion offer, five-year CDS spreads on financials tightened, with Bear Stearns narrowing by 35 basis points to 330bp on March 24, according to data from New York-based interdealer broker Phoenix Partners Group.
See also: JP Morgan raises Bear Stearns offer to $1.18 billion
JP Morgan buys Bear Stearns after receiving Fed guarantee
Credit crisis drives trading in financial CDS
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Risk, portfolio margin, regulation: regtech to the rescue
A white paper outlining the complexity of setting the course for risk, margin and regulation
Prop shops recoil from EU’s ‘ill-fitting’ capital regime
Large proprietary trading firms complain they are subject to hand-me-down rules originally designed for banks
Revealed: the three EU banks applying for IMA approval
BNP Paribas, Deutsche Bank and Intesa Sanpaolo ask ECB to use internal models for FRTB
FCA presses UK non-banks to put their affairs in order
Greater scrutiny of wind-down plans by regulator could alter capital and liquidity requirements
Industry calls for major rethink of Basel III rules
Isda AGM: Divergence on implementation suggests rules could be flawed, bankers say
Saudi Arabia poised to become clean netting jurisdiction
Isda AGM: Netting regulation awaiting final approvals from regulators
Japanese megabanks shun internal models as FRTB bites
Isda AGM: All in-scope banks opt for standardised approach to market risk; Nomura eyes IMA in 2025
CFTC chair backs easing of G-Sib surcharge in Basel endgame
Isda AGM: Fed’s proposed surcharge changes could hike client clearing cost by 80%
Most read
- For a growing number of banks, synthetics are the real deal
- Industry urges focus on initial margin instead of intraday VM
- Did Fed’s stress capital buffer blunt CCAR?