JP Morgan CDS exposure could top $10 trillion
JP Morgan’s proposed acquisition of Bear Stearns could push the bank’s already formidable footprint in the credit default swaps (CDS) market through the $10 trillion notional barrier, raising questions over the prudence of such large concentrations within a single firm.
JP Morgan already has $7.9 trillion of CDS contracts outstanding, more than twice that of Citi, the second largest player in the market, which has $3 trillion outstanding. Bear Stearns holds a share somewhere below this, and although it was unable to confirm the exact size of its CDS business, analysts estimate it has as much as $2.5 trillion in swaps outstanding.
Should the sum be added to JP Morgan’s own CDS book, the resulting $10.4 trillion volume would constitute just under a quarter of the credit derivatives market, estimated at $45.46 trillion in notional outstanding as of June 2007 by the International Swaps and Derivatives Association. The prospect of a single institution acting as counterparty for almost 25% of outstanding CDS trades has raised fears about extreme concentrations within the market.
Last month, analysts at Barclays Capital calculated that the failure of a dealer with $2 trillion in CDS contracts outstanding would lead to losses of between $36 billion and $47 billion for counterparties in those trades. JP Morgan analysts stress, however, that its CDS receivable mark-to-market exposure – a method they insist is a more reasonable measure of risk – is just $22 billion.
Some participants suggest the idea of a $10 trillion notional CDS exposure is far-fetched, and that a significant proportion of Bear Stearns’ outstanding CDSs would be netted against offsetting JP Morgan trades.
“JP Morgan will take Bear Stearns’ CDS inventory onto its inventory and then net it down against other trades it has on its own book,” says Lars Toomre, president of Connecticut-based financial engineering consultancy Toomre Capital Markets. “All outstanding swaps between JP Morgan and Bear Stearns will immediately be unwound, but there will also be CDS trades with other counterparties that both firms have in effect, and they too will have to be taken off. A lot of netting is likely to go on with such a big book of business, especially since those CDS contracts will probably be concentrated among the 20 US banks that serve as primary dealers.”
In the last week of March, after news broke of JP Morgan’s increased $1.2 billion offer, five-year CDS spreads on financials tightened, with Bear Stearns narrowing by 35 basis points to 330bp on March 24, according to data from New York-based interdealer broker Phoenix Partners Group.
See also: JP Morgan raises Bear Stearns offer to $1.18 billion
JP Morgan buys Bear Stearns after receiving Fed guarantee
Credit crisis drives trading in financial CDS
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
EBA seeks to allay Simm divergence concerns
EU validator pledges to co-ordinate with global regulators, but retains ability to act alone “if needed”
FRTB models find salvation in US Basel III proposal
Changes to P&L attribution test and NMRFs make IMA viable for US banks, risk managers say
US blows the floors off Basel III
Barr criticises “downward deviations” in US rule; Bowman rejects “blind adherence” to global standards
Basel III endgame – a timeline
A review of Risk.net’s coverage of the US implementation saga
Leaked EU plans offer extra temporary relief for FRTB models
Risk factors would need only two observations to be modellable. Do changes foreshadow US Basel III?
Iosco chief talks cyber, AI and clearing
Buenaventura discusses Iosco’s role in aiding market resilience and cross-border co-operation
US regulators bid to save FRTB IMA, but it’s no small task
Even if industry wish-list is granted, a 2028 start date might be too soon for model adoption
Hopes rise for cross-product netting under SA-CCR
Banks want rule change in Basel III endgame to lower capital costs of clearing UST repos