FSA extends short-selling disclosure requirement again
The UK Financial Services Authority (FSA) has extended its disclosure requirement for the short selling of 30 UK financial stocks.
The requirement - which originally came into effect on September 23, 2008 and was due to expire on June 30 - will remain unchanged: companies must report net short positions in excess of 0.25% of ordinary share capital on a daily basis, with further disclosures required after increases of more than 0.1 percentage points. The FSA has opted to maintain the disclosure, although it says it intends to eventually replace the current standard.
The FSA published a discussion paper on June 1 suggesting an extension of the short-selling disclosure regime, and inviting comment from 15 industry participants, including banks, investment management firms and industry bodies. According to the FSA, nine of the 15 respondents supported the extended disclosure regime, while two of the six dissenters were generally supportive of greater transparency but advocated different methods for disclosure.
Four respondents broadly supported the disclosure requirement, saying the benefits outweighed the costs. However, five respondents felt the FSA had underestimated the costs of complying with the disclosure requirement. Two respondents also pointed to the added costs of complying with the varied short-selling regimes across different jurisdictions on top of the FSA's requirement.
The FSA originally imposed the disclosure regime for short selling on September 23, 2008, following the imposition of a complete ban on the short selling of 34 UK financial stocks on September 18. Like other national financial regulators, the FSA feared financial stock prices were being driven down further by aggressive short sellers seeking to cash in on the dramatic downturn in equity markets.
The ban on short selling was lifted on January 16, but the disclosure regime was maintained. Meanwhile, the FSA released a discussion paper on February 6 to debate an appropriate short-selling regulatory framework going forward. Among other measures, the FSA expressed its preference for net short positions of 0.5% in a company to be reported publicly. Some investors have complained public disclosures could leave them open to being squeezed by competitors, and could create a herding effect.
The FSA has yet to give any further indication of when it will announce new short-selling regulations. "The FSA is currently analysing responses to its discussion paper (DP 09/1) on the options for a future short-selling disclosure regime for all UK stocks and remains committed to getting the widest possible international consensus on how the regime would work," the FSA wrote in a statement on June 26.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Regulators better prepared for next Credit Suisse, says SRB head
FSB strengthening guidance on international co-operation, but EU needs more mutual support
From Pillar to Pillar… to post: where now for op risk in Europe?
Experts think enhanced Pillar 2 charge informed by Dora would be more useful than a blunt Pillar 1
PRA struggles to follow Fed’s FRTB modelling moves
Market risk experts say minor differences in US rules add up to more incentives for IMA adoption
Lifeline keeps Europe’s hopes afloat for single-sided reporting
Despite Esma’s proposal for delegated reporting of trades, the industry may yet get its wish
EU’s plan to get competitive faces big legislative hurdles
Large and controversial legislative package may be too amorphous to deliver results quickly
FDIC relearns SVB lessons in resolution tinkering
Paring back requirements gets thumbs up from some, but concerns linger
Stablecoin consortia may be ‘interim’ step to solo bank issuance
Former Citi payments head and Ubyx founder says all G-Sibs will issue their own coins
Report once: will Esma’s €1bn reforms deliver the full picture?
Critics say plan to merge three reporting regimes will see scant returns, and won’t mesh with single-sided reporting