Isda launches CDS protocols for Icelandic bank settlement
Isda is providing protocols to amend CDS paperwork before the settlement auctions for Iceland’s defaulted banks
LONDON & NEW YORK – The International Swaps and Derivatives Association (Isda) has released credit default swap (CDS) settlement protocols for failed Icelandic banks Glitnir, Kaupthing and Landsbanki.
Around $71 billion in CDS contracts on the three banks must be settled, according to the New York-based Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC). This is split between $19.2 billion outstanding on Landsbanki, $18.5 billion on Glitnir and $34.3 billion on Kaupthing.
After netting down protections bought and sold by the same big players – which has reportedly successfully limited exposure to Lehman CDS counterparties – actual exposures might be around $14.8 billion, says the DTCC.
The new protocols aim to offer affected counterparties an efficient mechanism for the settlement of credit derivatives transactions. They offer institutions the opportunity to amend documentation to use auctions, scheduled by administrators Markit and Creditex for November 4, 5 and 6, to settle contracts referencing the three defaulted institutions.
David Geen, general counsel for Isda, said: “These are the first credit events to occur in the European market since Isda started publishing protocols for settlement. The experience of running these protocols successfully for over a dozen North American credit events will be of enormous benefit in ensuring the process runs equally smoothly in Europe.”
The Isda protocols are available until October 31 and are open to members and non-members alike.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
FRTB revamp won’t restore models to past glory, risk managers say
US-inspired reform only expected to lead to small boost in adoption, with limited desks on IMA
Regulators must think bigger to tackle tech risks, says Hong Kong SFC
Leung warns AI adoption and recent cyber scares show new threats require global co-operation
Time to let some air out of the banking system?
Watchdogs worry about lowering standards, but policy-makers eye growth – they face a difficult dilemma
Competitiveness mandate for Esma faces uphill battle
European Parliament offers last chance to force Esma to take more nuanced approach
Europe expects FRTB to bite on XVA hedges
Risk Benchmarking: One-third of European dealers fear new market risk rules will have major effect on hedges
Burning ambition: will Europe join the US in setting fire to the rules?
As the US dismantles post-crisis regulations, some think Europe will follow in a bid to boost economic growth
Can US perpetual futures solve their identity crisis?
Market could fall under four different regulatory categories, with sharply diverging outcomes
Banks want AML data upgrade to complement US regulatory reform
FinCEN’s proposed overhaul sparks debate on whether it will lead to smarter or weaker supervision