Madoff feeder fund accused of fraud and deception
NEW YORK - Hedge fund Fairfield Greenwich is facing charges of lying to investors over the Madoff fraud. The fund, founded by socialite Walter Noel, was reported to have had a $7 billion exposure to Bernard Madoff's $65 billion Ponzi scheme. Now it is facing a civil fraud complaint from Massachusetts secretary of state William Galvin alleging that it misled investors over due diligence performed on Madoff's collapsed scheme. Galvin - the top Massachusetts state regulator - says his office had tried to discern how Fairfield could not have discovered the fraud during its 18-year relationship with Madoff. Galvin said: "The answer is that they were blinded by fees, did not engage in meaningful due diligence and turned a blind eye to any fact that would have burst their lucrative bubble."
The fund released a statement in response to the regulator's accusations, calling them in turns sensational, false and misleading. Fairfield says the complaint is "based on nothing more than 20:20 hindsight" but fails to arrive at an accurate understanding of the facts and contains several inaccuracies in its version of events. The fund alludes to the fact that if the Securities and Exchange Commission, other US regulators and thousands of investors could be successfully hoodwinked by Madoff, then there is no reason to suggest that Fairfield could have done better to detect what it calls "his sophisticated fraud".
Fairfield allegedly told clients that it conducted daily monitoring of its holdings and risk profiles. The fund received information from Madoff three to five days after he allegedly conducted trades for the funds. Fairfield is the first feeder fund to face regulatory action linked to the Madoff fraud. It was rapidly revealed to be the most heavily exposed fund to the swindle after Madoff handed himself into regulators in December, claiming his investment fund was "one big lie". He subsequently pleaded guilty to fraud charges in March. Fairfield says it will vigorously contest the complaint.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
BoE’s Bailey expects global consensus on FRTB internal models
Isda AGM: UK is reviewing proposals from US and EU regulators before finalising its IMA rules
DRW chief slams ‘ridiculous’ OCC stablecoin rule
Isda AGM: Wilson warns week-long redemption freeze would deter use of Genius Act coins as cash leg of tokenised repo
Dealers push for more revisions to Basel III endgame
Isda AGM: Goldman, JP Morgan bankers want changes on cross-product netting, CVA and default risk charges
StanChart: UK, EU should copy US ‘commercial’ Basel III
Isda AGM: Exec warns divergent Basel III rules will push trading into less-regulated entities
NBFI oversight ‘no longer adequate’, say BdF economists
Researchers call for stronger supervision of non-bank sector ‘before risks actually materialise’
Why Brexit still stirs up trouble for cross-border business
As EU erects another obstacle, banks consider ways around it – or exit strategies
Can US regulators keep Collins happy with one capital stack?
Legal experts say Basel III endgame redraft retains spirit if not letter of the floor
EU states take the slow road to new cross-border services ban
Late national transposition hampers foreign banks’ decisions on location of affected activities