
Austrac censures two banks over breaches of AML law
Barclays and Mega International censured for breeches of rules governing anti-money laundering in Australia
SYDNEY - Barclays and Chinese lender Mega International have been censured by Australia's anti-money laundering body, the Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre (Austrac), for "significant breaches" of its rules on reporting suspicious transactions and account activity.
Austrac stated the banks' actions had left their services and the wider financial system vulnerable to potential abuse by criminals looking to launder the proceeds of crime or finance terrorism.
Barclays has undertaken to review all account transactions carried out since July 1, 2002 and will report any suspicious activity to Austrac. It will also have to submit information about any large fund transfers into or out of Australia.
Mega International has provided a similar guarantee to review transactions since January 2002, although the Australian Daily noted Austrac remains concerned the bank could still in breach of Australian law.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
How to reform the NSFR… and why regulators may never get there
Ideas for updating funding rules after SVB include recalibration and concentration limits
BoE takes subtle leverage snipe at CCP cross-margining
Margin offsets might increase risk, but could also encourage more central clearing
Should the Fed mandate collateral pre-positioning at the discount window?
Supervisor wants banks to be ready to access central bank facilities, but formalising pre-positioning has some drawbacks
Why Basel’s push to overhaul PFE is a wake-up call for risk teams
The regulatory push, lessons from Archegos and why a unified PFE/XVA framework is becoming the new standard
SEC faces debate over possible cull of cyber security rules
Lobby groups pushing for regulator to roll back disclosures, but investors take a different view
Emir rule delay leaves Simm paperwork gathering dust
Mid-year refresh triggers Emir 3.0 authorisation process despite unfinished regulatory standards
EC moots postponing 122 delegated acts to cut compliance costs
Secondary legislation from CRR, Emir and Mifir identified as suitable for unspecified delay
Esma sounds out industry for ways to cut reporting burden
Markets watchdog asks consultative groups for ideas to simplify reporting rules