FSA fines BNP Paribas £350,000 for weak anti-fraud controls
LONDON – The Financial Services Authority (FSA) has fined BNP Paribas' (BNPP) private bank London branch £350,000 for lax systems and controls that facilitated a series of fraudulent transactions by a senior staff member.
Between February 2002 and March 2005, through a series of 13 transactions, a senior employee fraudulently transferred £1.4 million out of several clients' accounts. Most of the transactions involved forged signatures and instructions, and false changes of clients' addresses.
The FSA found a lack of an independent before-the-event check on significant transfers of money from client accounts at BNPP, and that in the case of large transactions, no form of independent risk-based review or challenge process was in place either before or after the transactions took place.
In addition, the regulator charged that a number of the fraudulent transactions were not independently reviewed by senior management prior to payment, and the forged instructions were seen only by the dishonest employee, since local procedures were not clear on senior review requirements.
Basic authorisation and signatory checks were also found to have not been conducted by the middle office in respect of internal transfers, and the information provided in the report to support reviews of substantial transactions were not adequately detailed to enhance the effectiveness of the report in identifying unusual or suspicious transactions.
This is the first time a private bank has been fined for weaknesses in its anti-fraud systems by the UK regulator. FSA director of enforcement Margaret Cole said: "This is a warning to other firms that we are raising our game in this area and expect them to follow suit. We will not hesitate to take action against any firm found wanting".
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Review of 2025: It’s the end of the world, and it feels fine
Markets proved resilient as Trump redefined US policies – but questions are piling up about 2026 and beyond
Hong Kong derivatives regime could drive more offshore booking
Industry warns new capital requirements for securities firms are higher than other jurisdictions
Will Iosco’s guidance solve pre-hedging puzzle?
Buy-siders doubt consent requirement will remove long-standing concerns
Responsible AI is about payoffs as much as principles
How one firm cut loan processing times and improved fraud detection without compromising on governance
Could one-off loan losses at US regional banks become systemic?
Investors bet Zions, Western Alliance are isolated problems, but credit risk managers are nervous
SEC poised to approve expansion of CME-FICC cross-margining
Agency’s new division heads moving swiftly on applications related to US Treasury clearing
ECB bank supervisors want top-down stress test that bites
Proposal would simplify capital structure with something similar to US stress capital buffer
Clearing houses warn Esma margin rules will stifle innovation
Changes in model confidence levels could still trip supervisory threshold even after relaxation in final RTS