FSA fines BNP Paribas £350,000 for weak anti-fraud controls
LONDON – The Financial Services Authority (FSA) has fined BNP Paribas' (BNPP) private bank London branch £350,000 for lax systems and controls that facilitated a series of fraudulent transactions by a senior staff member.
Between February 2002 and March 2005, through a series of 13 transactions, a senior employee fraudulently transferred £1.4 million out of several clients' accounts. Most of the transactions involved forged signatures and instructions, and false changes of clients' addresses.
The FSA found a lack of an independent before-the-event check on significant transfers of money from client accounts at BNPP, and that in the case of large transactions, no form of independent risk-based review or challenge process was in place either before or after the transactions took place.
In addition, the regulator charged that a number of the fraudulent transactions were not independently reviewed by senior management prior to payment, and the forged instructions were seen only by the dishonest employee, since local procedures were not clear on senior review requirements.
Basic authorisation and signatory checks were also found to have not been conducted by the middle office in respect of internal transfers, and the information provided in the report to support reviews of substantial transactions were not adequately detailed to enhance the effectiveness of the report in identifying unusual or suspicious transactions.
This is the first time a private bank has been fined for weaknesses in its anti-fraud systems by the UK regulator. FSA director of enforcement Margaret Cole said: "This is a warning to other firms that we are raising our game in this area and expect them to follow suit. We will not hesitate to take action against any firm found wanting".
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
FCMs warn of regulatory gaps in crypto clearing
CFTC request for comment uncovers concerns over customer protection and unchecked advertising
UK clearing houses face tougher capital regime than EU peers
Ice resists BoE plan to move second skin in the game higher up capital stack, but members approve
ECB seeks capital clarity on Spire repacks
Dealers split between counterparty credit risk and market risk frameworks for repack RWAs
FSB chief defends global non-bank regulation drive
Schindler slams ‘misconception’ that regulators intend to impose standardised bank-like rules
Fed fractures post-SVB consensus on emergency liquidity
New supervisory principles support FHLB funding over discount window preparedness
Why UPIs could spell goodbye for OTC-Isins
Critics warn UK will miss opportunity to simplify transaction reporting if it spurns UPI
EC’s closing auction plan faces cool reception from markets
Participants say proposal for multiple EU equity closing auctions would split price formation
Fed pivots to material risk – but what is it, exactly?
Top US bank regulator will prioritise risks that matter most, but they could prove hard to pinpoint