
FSA fines BNP Paribas £350,000 for weak anti-fraud controls
LOSSES & LAWSUITS
Between February 2002 and March 2005, through a series of 13 transactions, a senior employee fraudulently transferred £1.4 million out of several clients' accounts. Most of the transactions involved forged signatures and instructions, and false changes of clients' addresses.
The FSA found a lack of an independent before-the-event check on significant transfers of money from client accounts at BNPP, and that in the case of large transactions, no form of independent risk-based review or challenge process was in place either before or after the transactions took place.
In addition, the regulator charged that a number of the fraudulent transactions were not independently reviewed by senior management prior to payment, and the forged instructions were seen only by the dishonest employee, since local procedures were not clear on senior review requirements.
Basic authorisation and signatory checks were also found to have not been conducted by the middle office in respect of internal transfers, and the information provided in the report to support reviews of substantial transactions were not adequately detailed to enhance the effectiveness of the report in identifying unusual or suspicious transactions.
This is the first time a private bank has been fined for weaknesses in its anti-fraud systems by the UK regulator. FSA director of enforcement Margaret Cole said: "This is a warning to other firms that we are raising our game in this area and expect them to follow suit. We will not hesitate to take action against any firm found wanting".
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
US banks race against time as Fed plays climate catch-up
Long-awaited US climate risk exercise puts tough pressure on banks’ data and models
EU banks need ‘billions’ in hedges to pass new NII test
Declines in net interest income can be hedged, but the markets may struggle to handle the demand
CFTC chair gloomy over crypto legislation prospects
FIA Boca 2023: Behnam also asks Congress to grant more powers to regulate third-party tech providers
Missing Basel metric could have revealed SVB risks
US regulators did not implement economic value of equity test that SVB failed badly in 2021
Strict term SOFR trading rules ‘permanent’ says Fed’s Bowman
Official says restrictions on use of term SOFR swaps “should not be expected to change”
Esma still wants more tools to tackle clearing crises
Even after Emir 3 draft, EU regulator would like more powers over both foreign and domestic CCPs
Club rules? How German retail trading venues shut out PTFs
Murky rule books prevent non-bank market-makers from competing for Europe’s growing online customer demand
Regulated UK crypto firms fear authorisation Groundhog Day
Industry wants grandfathering in new Treasury framework to avoid business continuity risk