Investors sue HSBC, BNY Mellon and Lehman over 'Minibonds'
HONG KONG & NEW YORK - A group of Hong Kong investors that bought 'minibonds' linked to Lehman Brothers has filed a class-action lawsuit against Bank of New York Mellon, HSBC and bankruptcy-filed Lehman Brothers. Investors allege the minibonds were sold as safe bonds but were in fact backed by now largely worthless collateralised debt obligations and credit default swaps. They allege Bank of New York Mellon and HSBC failed to protect the 34,000 Hong Kong buyers of the complex derivative instruments linked to the failed US investment bank.
The lawsuit is trying to claw back the $1.6 billion held in collateral by HSBC and BNY Mellon to be released to investors. The investors claim HSBC is the issuer, trustee and custodian of the minibonds and BNY Mellon is custodian of some assets held within the structured products whose value has been slashed since Lehman's collapse. HSBC says it was trustee but not issuer of the minibonds and did not know whether it was custodian.
It is understood that 34,000 Hong Kong investors bought $1.79 billion of minibonds from 23 local banks and brokers. A special committee of Hong Kong's legislative council and the jurisdiction's Securities and Futures Commission are investigating allegations of mis-selling.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Revealed: the three EU banks applying for IMA approval
BNP Paribas, Deutsche Bank and Intesa Sanpaolo ask ECB to use internal models for FRTB
FCA presses UK non-banks to put their affairs in order
Greater scrutiny of wind-down plans by regulator could alter capital and liquidity requirements
Industry calls for major rethink of Basel III rules
Isda AGM: Divergence on implementation suggests rules could be flawed, bankers say
Saudi Arabia poised to become clean netting jurisdiction
Isda AGM: Netting regulation awaiting final approvals from regulators
Japanese megabanks shun internal models as FRTB bites
Isda AGM: All in-scope banks opt for standardised approach to market risk; Nomura eyes IMA in 2025
CFTC chair backs easing of G-Sib surcharge in Basel endgame
Isda AGM: Fed’s proposed surcharge changes could hike client clearing cost by 80%
UK investment firms feeling the heat on prudential rules
Signs firms are falling behind FCA’s expectations on wind-down and liquidity risk management
The American way: a stress-test substitute for Basel’s IRRBB?
Bankers divided over new CCAR scenario designed to bridge supervisory gap exposed by SVB failure