Investors sue HSBC, BNY Mellon and Lehman over 'Minibonds'
HONG KONG & NEW YORK - A group of Hong Kong investors that bought 'minibonds' linked to Lehman Brothers has filed a class-action lawsuit against Bank of New York Mellon, HSBC and bankruptcy-filed Lehman Brothers. Investors allege the minibonds were sold as safe bonds but were in fact backed by now largely worthless collateralised debt obligations and credit default swaps. They allege Bank of New York Mellon and HSBC failed to protect the 34,000 Hong Kong buyers of the complex derivative instruments linked to the failed US investment bank.
The lawsuit is trying to claw back the $1.6 billion held in collateral by HSBC and BNY Mellon to be released to investors. The investors claim HSBC is the issuer, trustee and custodian of the minibonds and BNY Mellon is custodian of some assets held within the structured products whose value has been slashed since Lehman's collapse. HSBC says it was trustee but not issuer of the minibonds and did not know whether it was custodian.
It is understood that 34,000 Hong Kong investors bought $1.79 billion of minibonds from 23 local banks and brokers. A special committee of Hong Kong's legislative council and the jurisdiction's Securities and Futures Commission are investigating allegations of mis-selling.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Double, but no trouble? CVA capital hit may lack clout
Industry opinion mixed around Basel III endgame derivatives charge
Amid debanking drama, banks try to say ‘no’, safely
A basic risk management tool – the ability to turn a customer away – has become a political football
Erba myth: will US banks choose new capital measure?
B3E gives US banks a dilemma – adopt expanded risk-based approach, or a new standardised alternative
Illiquid assets pricing still needs expert judgement, say banks
EU regulators want more transparency in valuations, but some asset prices remain elusive
Fed to move tailored-capital goalposts soon, says Bowman
Banks hope agencies will index triggers for harsher capital rules to economic growth
Will SEC reporting proposal supercharge alt data providers?
Move that would allow companies to opt out of quarterly reporting disclosures welcomed
EU lawmaker calls for review of Luxembourg’s cross-border rules
Grand Duchy accused of side-stepping rules aimed at prising away banking business from London
Un-American or un-JPM? Surcharge rethink divides G-Sibs
Some see sense in rethink to funding indicator, others call for a backtrack