Banco Delta Asia comes clean over purchase of gold from North Korea
Banco Delta Asia, labelled by the US Treasury as a "primary money laundering concern", has admitted that it purchased a large amount of gold from North Korea, one of its biggest exports.
Through its US lawyers Heller Ehrman, Delta Asia stated that it bought 9.2 tonnes of gold from North Korea in the three years to September 2005, selling it through Delta Asia Credit, its Hong Kong unit, and taking commission of $1.50 an ounce. The article said this raised $120 million for Pyongyang.
Delta Asia's Treasury filing also acknowledged that the bank had provided services to North Korea's Tanchon Commercial Bank, which had been blacklisted three months before by the US, deeming it the main North Korean financial agent for sales of conventional arms, ballistic missiles and related goods.
Delta Asia blames outdated technology for the oversight and for its inability to generate reports on unusual deposits and possible shortcomings in screening retail cash deposits for counterfeit currency. Ernst & Young, which reviewed the bank's operations last year, found that the bank paid insufficient attention to maintaining its own books and had identified a North Korea-related account that bank staff had missed during the original asset freeze.
Delta Asia's statement is an attempt to get the US Treasury to lift its labelling as a primary money laundering concern, which had caused other banks to break off commercial ties with Delta Asia, and had panicked customers.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Esma denies need for new competitiveness mandate
MEP wants explicit requirement; Esma official says it’s already covered in existing rulebook
US regulators cut FRTB’s IMA capital hit by 59%, Isda finds
Trade body pushes for further changes to cross-product netting, default risk charge
US FRTB glitch could spit out negative capital charges
Effort to recognise risk diversification between IMA and standardised approach went too far
Euronext, LCH back Esma as exchange super-regulator
National oversight hurts Europe, exchange officials say – but some are not ready to accept a single watchdog
Double, but no trouble? CVA capital hit may lack clout
Industry opinion mixed around Basel III endgame derivatives charge
Amid debanking drama, banks try to say ‘no’, safely
A basic risk management tool – the ability to turn a customer away – has become a political football
Erba myth: will US banks choose new capital measure?
B3E gives US banks a dilemma – adopt expanded risk-based approach, or a new standardised alternative
Illiquid assets pricing still needs expert judgement, say banks
EU regulators want more transparency in valuations, but some asset prices remain elusive