US-China commission warns of fraud risk
US government hears recommendations on Chinese sovereign wealth funds
WASHINGTON, DC – The US-China Economic and Security Review Commission has recommended to US Congress increased controls over Chinese sovereign wealth funds, to reduce insider fraud risk.
National security questions have been raised by recent injections of Chinese capital into the US economy in the form of sovereign wealth funds; increasingly becoming a political rather than economic debate.
“The US economy must remain open for investment. I think we all agree on that. However, some observers have questioned whether one nation’s sovereign investments could lead to influence over key industries, access to technology, or influence over another nation’s policies,” said the Commission’s chairman, Larry Wortzel, to Congress.
Sovereign wealth funds could have access to government officials and information that is not available to other investors.
“We are concerned that some sovereign wealth funds, or persons associated with them such as some hedge funds, might undermine market integrity by engaging in insider trading or other market abuses,” said Linda Chatman Thomsen, director in the division of enforcement at the SEC.
“We are concerned that if the government from which we seek assistance is also controlling the entity under investigation, the nature and extent of co-operation could be compromised,” said Thomsen.
Sovereign wealth funds have invested $44.3 billion in US banks, brokers and financial firms since 2006, according to consultancy Federal Financial Analytics.
The SEC has already highlighted Chinese insider-trading risks. On February 5 it said it had settled with a former Dow Jones board member and three other Hong Kong residents accused of insider trading and illegal tipping before news of an unsolicited buyout offer by News Corporation sent Dow Jones shares soaring last year.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
EBA seeks to allay Simm divergence concerns
EU validator pledges to co-ordinate with global regulators, but retains ability to act alone “if needed”
FRTB models find salvation in US Basel III proposal
Changes to P&L attribution test and NMRFs make IMA viable for US banks, risk managers say
US blows the floors off Basel III
Barr criticises “downward deviations” in US rule; Bowman rejects “blind adherence” to global standards
Basel III endgame – a timeline
A review of Risk.net’s coverage of the US implementation saga
Leaked EU plans offer extra temporary relief for FRTB models
Risk factors would need only two observations to be modellable. Do changes foreshadow US Basel III?
Iosco chief talks cyber, AI and clearing
Buenaventura discusses Iosco’s role in aiding market resilience and cross-border co-operation
US regulators bid to save FRTB IMA, but it’s no small task
Even if industry wish-list is granted, a 2028 start date might be too soon for model adoption
Hopes rise for cross-product netting under SA-CCR
Banks want rule change in Basel III endgame to lower capital costs of clearing UST repos