FDIC Seeking $200 million fine over Subprime Credit Cards
WASHINGTON, DC - US regulator the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) has issued enforcement actions against Atlanta-based credit provider CompuCredit and First Bank of Delaware and First Bank & Trust of Brookings, South Dakota. The regulator is trying to claim as much as $200 million through the US legal system over deceptive marketing practices that breach the Federal Trade Commission Act in the selling of subprime credit cards. The FDIC is also seeking civil money penalties totalling $6.2 million against CompuCredit, and $431,000 against the two banks. The regulator has already settled with a third bank, Columbus and Trust, for $2.4 million.
The FDIC's case is based on improper selling of three categories of Visa and Mastercard credit cards. One of these was a fees-based card package aimed at customers with low credit scores, for which the FDIC alleges CompuCredit failed to properly disclose upfront fees and therefore the remaining credit available. The second product was aimed at consumers with higher credit ratings and offered a higher limit, but failed to disclose the true credit limit for the first 90 days, or that it would monitor purchasing behaviour, and potentially reduce their credit limits based on undisclosed scoring models. The other is a debt transfer card marketed to customers with debt elsewhere. The FDIC claims that CompuCredit offered to transfer the debts off the card and report them to consumer reporting agencies as paid off, when customers were in fact enrolled on a debt repayment plan, did not receive a Visa unless they paid their debts within a year, and when they did it was assigned nominal credit.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
ECB seeks capital clarity on Spire repacks
Dealers split between counterparty credit risk and market risk frameworks for repack RWAs
FSB chief defends global non-bank regulation drive
Schindler slams ‘misconception’ that regulators intend to impose standardised bank-like rules
Fed fractures post-SVB consensus on emergency liquidity
New supervisory principles support FHLB funding over discount window preparedness
Why UPIs could spell goodbye for OTC-Isins
Critics warn UK will miss opportunity to simplify transaction reporting if it spurns UPI
EC’s closing auction plan faces cool reception from markets
Participants say proposal for multiple EU equity closing auctions would split price formation
Fed pivots to material risk – but what is it, exactly?
Top US bank regulator will prioritise risks that matter most, but they could prove hard to pinpoint
Hopes rise for EU re-entry to UK swaps market
EC says discussions on draft decision softening derivatives trading obligation are ‘advanced’
BoE’s Ramsden defends UK’s ring-fencing regime
Deputy governor also says regulatory reform is coming to the UK gilt repo market