
FDIC Seeking $200 million fine over Subprime Credit Cards
Losses and Lawsuits
WASHINGTON, DC - US regulator the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) has issued enforcement actions against Atlanta-based credit provider CompuCredit and First Bank of Delaware and First Bank & Trust of Brookings, South Dakota. The regulator is trying to claim as much as $200 million through the US legal system over deceptive marketing practices that breach the Federal Trade Commission Act in the selling of subprime credit cards. The FDIC is also seeking civil money penalties totalling $6.2 million against CompuCredit, and $431,000 against the two banks. The regulator has already settled with a third bank, Columbus and Trust, for $2.4 million.
The FDIC's case is based on improper selling of three categories of Visa and Mastercard credit cards. One of these was a fees-based card package aimed at customers with low credit scores, for which the FDIC alleges CompuCredit failed to properly disclose upfront fees and therefore the remaining credit available. The second product was aimed at consumers with higher credit ratings and offered a higher limit, but failed to disclose the true credit limit for the first 90 days, or that it would monitor purchasing behaviour, and potentially reduce their credit limits based on undisclosed scoring models. The other is a debt transfer card marketed to customers with debt elsewhere. The FDIC claims that CompuCredit offered to transfer the debts off the card and report them to consumer reporting agencies as paid off, when customers were in fact enrolled on a debt repayment plan, did not receive a Visa unless they paid their debts within a year, and when they did it was assigned nominal credit.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
EU banks fear Brexit battle over FRTB internal models
Bank of England approach looks easier, but that may not make much difference to model uptake
Europe’s new IRRBB test: the riddle with no answer
A proposed compromise on net interest income test is not scientific, but exact calibration may be impossible
Eurex clearing chief calls for active account carve-outs
Isda AGM: Müller says EU clearing thresholds should exempt market-making and US client trades
The regulator that troubleshoots first, asks questions later
Canada’s bank watchdog aims to intervene early to tackle burgeoning risks, even at the expense of “perfect” regulatory decisions
Banks dispute EBA’s new threshold for IRRBB test
Banks say new proposal for identifying outliers on net interest income is still too severe
Investor wish-list offers no quick fix for Swiss CoCos
Some want bond doc overhaul to clarify bail-in risk, but sovereigns can always change the rules
SVB failure signals Fed’s need for a speed rethink
Rapid transition to large-bank bracket left supervisors flat footed on rate risk
Doubts mount over BoE proposal to dilute bank liquidity rules
Before SVB collapse, UK suggested loosening NSFR reporting for smaller banks