FSA fines Capital One for improper selling of PPI and unfair treatment of customers
LONDON - The UK Financial Services Authority (FSA) has fined Capital One Bank £175,000 for failing to have adequate systems and controls for selling Payment Protection Insurance (PPI), and for failing to treat its customers fairly.
Capital One's primary business is providing credit cards, loans and savings accounts, but it also sells PPI on a non-advised basis to its customers during the card application process or via follow-up calls. The FSA investigation focused purely on credit card PPI sales and found that from January 2005 to April 2006, Capital One failed to ensure that 50,000 customers received important information about the policy including all exclusions, although they did receive a policy summary. Affected customers were unable to check what they were covered for or whether the policy was right for them.
Capital One has carried out a full remedial programme to address the systems and controls issues, one part of which ensured that those customers who did not receive the policy document were compensated. The cost of this part, including potential premium refunds and settled claims, is estimated at around £3.0 million, of which £1.1 million related to customers after general insurance regulation started in January 2005.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Double, but no trouble? CVA capital hit may lack clout
Industry opinion mixed around Basel III endgame derivatives charge
Amid debanking drama, banks try to say ‘no’, safely
A basic risk management tool – the ability to turn a customer away – has become a political football
Erba myth: will US banks choose new capital measure?
B3E gives US banks a dilemma – adopt expanded risk-based approach, or a new standardised alternative
Illiquid assets pricing still needs expert judgement, say banks
EU regulators want more transparency in valuations, but some asset prices remain elusive
Fed to move tailored-capital goalposts soon, says Bowman
Banks hope agencies will index triggers for harsher capital rules to economic growth
Will SEC reporting proposal supercharge alt data providers?
Move that would allow companies to opt out of quarterly reporting disclosures welcomed
EU lawmaker calls for review of Luxembourg’s cross-border rules
Grand Duchy accused of side-stepping rules aimed at prising away banking business from London
Un-American or un-JPM? Surcharge rethink divides G-Sibs
Some see sense in rethink to funding indicator, others call for a backtrack