FSA fines Capital One for improper selling of PPI and unfair treatment of customers
LONDON - The UK Financial Services Authority (FSA) has fined Capital One Bank £175,000 for failing to have adequate systems and controls for selling Payment Protection Insurance (PPI), and for failing to treat its customers fairly.
Capital One's primary business is providing credit cards, loans and savings accounts, but it also sells PPI on a non-advised basis to its customers during the card application process or via follow-up calls. The FSA investigation focused purely on credit card PPI sales and found that from January 2005 to April 2006, Capital One failed to ensure that 50,000 customers received important information about the policy including all exclusions, although they did receive a policy summary. Affected customers were unable to check what they were covered for or whether the policy was right for them.
Capital One has carried out a full remedial programme to address the systems and controls issues, one part of which ensured that those customers who did not receive the policy document were compensated. The cost of this part, including potential premium refunds and settled claims, is estimated at around £3.0 million, of which £1.1 million related to customers after general insurance regulation started in January 2005.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Hong Kong derivatives regime could drive more offshore booking
Industry warns new capital requirements for securities firms are higher than other jurisdictions
Will Iosco’s guidance solve pre-hedging puzzle?
Buy-siders doubt consent requirement will remove long-standing concerns
Responsible AI is about payoffs as much as principles
How one firm cut loan processing times and improved fraud detection without compromising on governance
Could one-off loan losses at US regional banks become systemic?
Investors bet Zions, Western Alliance are isolated problems, but credit risk managers are nervous
SEC poised to approve expansion of CME-FICC cross-margining
Agency’s new division heads moving swiftly on applications related to US Treasury clearing
ECB bank supervisors want top-down stress test that bites
Proposal would simplify capital structure with something similar to US stress capital buffer
Clearing houses warn Esma margin rules will stifle innovation
Changes in model confidence levels could still trip supervisory threshold even after relaxation in final RTS
BlackRock, Citadel Securities, Nasdaq mull tokenised equities’ impact on regulations
An SEC panel recently debated the ramifications of a future with tokenised equities