Nationwide fined £980,000 for information security lapses
LONDON - The UK Financial Services Authority (FSA) has fined Nationwide building society £980,000, for failing to have effective systems and controls in place to manage its information security risks.
Following the theft of a laptop computer from a Nationwide employee's home last year, the FSA launched an investigation into the building society's information security procedures, and found them to be inadequate, potentially exposing customers to an increased risk of financial crime. More worryingly, the FSA investigation discovered Nationwide was not aware the laptop contained confidential customer information, and that the building society did not start an investigation until three weeks after the theft.
"Nationwide is the UK's largest building society and holds confidential information for more than 11 million customers," says Margaret Cole, director of enforcement at the FSA. "Nationwide's customers were entitled to rely on it to take reasonable steps to make sure their personal information was secure. Firms' internal controls are fundamental in ensuring customers' details remain as secure as they can be and, as technology evolves, they must keep their systems and controls up-to-date to prevent lapses in security. The FSA took swift enforcement action in this case to send a clear, strong message to all firms about the importance of information security."
Nationwide co-operated fully with the FSA and by agreeing to settle at an early stage, it qualified for a 30% discount, without which the fine would have been £1.4 million.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Esma denies need for new competitiveness mandate
MEP wants explicit requirement; Esma official says it’s already covered in existing rulebook
US regulators cut FRTB’s IMA capital hit by 59%, Isda finds
Trade body pushes for further changes to cross-product netting, default risk charge
US FRTB glitch could spit out negative capital charges
Effort to recognise risk diversification between IMA and standardised approach went too far
Euronext, LCH back Esma as exchange super-regulator
National oversight hurts Europe, exchange officials say – but some are not ready to accept a single watchdog
Double, but no trouble? CVA capital hit may lack clout
Industry opinion mixed around Basel III endgame derivatives charge
Amid debanking drama, banks try to say ‘no’, safely
A basic risk management tool – the ability to turn a customer away – has become a political football
Erba myth: will US banks choose new capital measure?
B3E gives US banks a dilemma – adopt expanded risk-based approach, or a new standardised alternative
Illiquid assets pricing still needs expert judgement, say banks
EU regulators want more transparency in valuations, but some asset prices remain elusive