Hedge fund manager in fraud investigation
A Long Island asset manager is at the centre of a legal investigation for fraud
NEW YORK & WASHINGTON, DC - US authorities are investigating an alleged hedge fund fraud involving fund manager Corey Ribotsky, who runs the NIR investment fund.
FBI investigators, regulators from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and prosecutors at the New York US attorney's office in Brooklyn have not charged Ribotsky but are probing NIR, where Ribotsky is responsible for around $770 million of clients' funds.
The SEC has subpoenaed the NIR, requesting yearly, monthly and quarterly performance returns stretching from the present back to January 2004, in addition to evidence of NIR's internal performance calculation, pitch books, investor presentations, letters and emails.
Funds under Ribotsky's control have reported consistently positive returns. One of his funds, AJW Qualified Partners, reported more than 8% interest for the first nine months of 2008, while NIR's funds had positive returns in 114 out of 117 months.
Another fund, called AJW Offshore II, reported annual returns of more than 16% for the past three years, and a 10% return in 2008, which compares with an average 21.6% decline of hedge funds reported in a Barclay Hedge report using an index of 2,700 hedge funds.
Ribotsky and one of his hedge funds have already been sued several times in the past year by investors claiming that they were improperly prevented from making redemptions last autumn.
In one New York state court-filed lawsuit against Ribotsky and NIR, Gerald and Michael Tucci said that, when they asked to redeem about $1.5 million, Ribotsky instead gave them securities in a small company and told them that the value of the shares was equal to that of their investment. But when the investors tried to sell the shares, they discovered they were nearly worthless, according to the lawsuit.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Double, but no trouble? CVA capital hit may lack clout
Industry opinion mixed around Basel endgame derivatives charge
Amid debanking drama, banks try to say ‘no’, safely
A basic risk management tool – the ability to turn a customer away – has become a political football
Erba myth: will US banks choose new capital measure?
B3E gives US banks a dilemma – adopt expanded risk-based approach, or a new standardised alternative
Illiquid assets pricing still needs expert judgement, say banks
EU regulators want more transparency in valuations, but some asset prices remain elusive
Fed to move tailored-capital goalposts soon, says Bowman
Banks hope agencies will index triggers for harsher capital rules to economic growth
Will SEC reporting proposal supercharge alt data providers?
Move that would allow companies to opt out of quarterly reporting disclosures welcomed
EU lawmaker calls for review of Luxembourg’s cross-border rules
Grand Duchy accused of side-stepping rules aimed at prising away banking business from London
Un-American or un-JPM? Surcharge rethink divides G-Sibs
Some see sense in rethink to funding indicator, others call for a backtrack