Chaos surrounds Qinetiq privatisation
LONDON – The £1.3 billion privatisation of UK defence firm Qinetiq by the government was thrown into disarray in late January. Newspaper accounts first focused on the fact that only institutional investors were being offered shares in the initial public offering planned for February, not small investors.
But the scandal then grew when the British press disclosed that key members of the Qinetiq management team would be making significant sums of money as a result of the IPO, with the words 'fat cats' appearing in several headlines. In late January, the UK's National Audit Office said it would be conducting a study on how Qinetiq's privitisation was being handled, including the original sale of a 30.5% stake in the firm to US private equity firm the Carlyle Group in 2002 for just £42 million – the current privatisation will net Carlyle an estimated £150 million. Credit Suisse, JP Morgan Cazenove and Merrill Lynch are handling the IPO, while ABN-Amro Rothschild is acting as an adviser. It's the first UK privatisation since the government of John Major sold British Energy in July 1996.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Credit spread risk: the cryptic peril on bank balance sheets
Some bankers fear EU regulatory push on CSRBB has done little to improve risk management
Credit spread risk approach differs among EU banks, survey finds
KPMG survey of more than 90 banks reveals disagreement on how to treat liabilities and loans
Bowman’s Fed may limp on by after cuts
New vice-chair seeks efficiency, but staff clear-out could hamper functions, say former regulators
Review of 2025: It’s the end of the world, and it feels fine
Markets proved resilient as Trump redefined US policies – but questions are piling up about 2026 and beyond
Hong Kong derivatives regime could drive more offshore booking
Industry warns new capital requirements for securities firms are higher than other jurisdictions
Will Iosco’s guidance solve pre-hedging puzzle?
Buy-siders doubt consent requirement will remove long-standing concerns
Responsible AI is about payoffs as much as principles
How one firm cut loan processing times and improved fraud detection without compromising on governance
Could one-off loan losses at US regional banks become systemic?
Investors bet Zions, Western Alliance are isolated problems, but credit risk managers are nervous