Chaos surrounds Qinetiq privatisation
LONDON – The £1.3 billion privatisation of UK defence firm Qinetiq by the government was thrown into disarray in late January. Newspaper accounts first focused on the fact that only institutional investors were being offered shares in the initial public offering planned for February, not small investors.
But the scandal then grew when the British press disclosed that key members of the Qinetiq management team would be making significant sums of money as a result of the IPO, with the words 'fat cats' appearing in several headlines. In late January, the UK's National Audit Office said it would be conducting a study on how Qinetiq's privitisation was being handled, including the original sale of a 30.5% stake in the firm to US private equity firm the Carlyle Group in 2002 for just £42 million – the current privatisation will net Carlyle an estimated £150 million. Credit Suisse, JP Morgan Cazenove and Merrill Lynch are handling the IPO, while ABN-Amro Rothschild is acting as an adviser. It's the first UK privatisation since the government of John Major sold British Energy in July 1996.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
EU states take the slow road to new cross-border services ban
Late national transposition hampers foreign banks’ decisions on location of affected activities
Don’t mention the rules: the fight against prediction market abuse
For the CFTC to regulate new venues effectively, it must first redefine insider trading
Can the US FRTB revamp make the IMA great again?
Banks are finally presented with a viable internal models framework under Basel III’s market risk rules
UK rethinking tougher capital rules for US bank subsidiaries
US endgame draft would trigger UK Basel III trap floor for foreign banks, but PRA is reviewing
EBA proposes drastic overhaul to supervisory data reporting
Revamp will cut back the number of datapoints and integrate overlapping reports
CFTC wants to regulate prediction markets. Is it up to the task?
Former officials echo state gambling authorities’ concerns over agency’s ability to police betting risks
EBA seeks to allay Simm divergence concerns
EU validator pledges to co-ordinate with global regulators, but retains ability to act alone “if needed”
FRTB models find salvation in US Basel III proposal
Changes to P&L attribution test and NMRFs make IMA viable for US banks, risk managers say