FSA fines Merrill Lynch Intl
The Financial Services Authority (FSA) has fined Merrill Lynch International £150,000 for inaccurate transaction reports to the FSA and the Securities and Futures Authority (SFA).
The FSA alleged that between September 1996 and January 2006, Merrill Lynch incorrectly reported an estimated 1.2 million transactions in non-UK European equities.
Merrill's questionable transactions showed the firm's status as 'agent' rather than 'principal', because the transaction reporting system was set to report trades from the client's perspective rather than the firm's, according to the FSA.
Merrill only spotted the error in the transaction reporting system in December 2005. This was despite the broker-dealer's increased focus on transaction reporting issues following a private warning from the FSA in November 2002, and subsequent discussions with the FSA about certain transactions in 2004 and 2005.
The broker-dealer violated rule 5.49 of the SFA, which requires a firm to supply the SFA with details about the investment transactions it effects.
In imposing the financial penalty, the FSA took into account relevant factors, including the fact that Merrill acted proactively in reporting the failure to the regulator and that the reporting failure was not deliberate or reckless.
Merrill Lynch reported the transaction failures to the FSA in January 2006, and has co-operated fully with the FSA's investigation.
The firm completed a systems change to correct the error, and has revised the testing mandate to include all mandatory fields.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Basel III endgame: overall relief hides winners and losers
G-Sibs gain from surcharge reform while AOCI hits regional banks
One thing missing from US Basel III proposal: a deadline
Without a deadline, risk teams will struggle to secure resources to begin implementation projects
In simplifying credit risk models, EBA could compound capital costs
Skipping hard yards of internal ratings-based approach might trip higher capital charges and implementation costs
Change fatigue could dim EBA’s credit risk simplicity drive
Revisions may be kept to a minimum as short-term implementation burden weighs on banks
Foreign banks can swerve US Basel op risk capital charges
New proposal offers category III and IV banks op-out from regime, but intragroup trades penalised
BoE’s Bailey expects global consensus on FRTB internal models
Isda AGM: UK is reviewing proposals from US and EU regulators before finalising its IMA rules
DRW chief slams ‘ridiculous’ OCC stablecoin rule
Isda AGM: Wilson warns week-long redemption freeze would deter use of Genius Act coins as cash leg of tokenised repo
Dealers push for more revisions to Basel III endgame
Isda AGM: Goldman, JP Morgan bankers want changes on cross-product netting, CVA and default risk charges