FSA fines Merrill Lynch Intl
The Financial Services Authority (FSA) has fined Merrill Lynch International £150,000 for inaccurate transaction reports to the FSA and the Securities and Futures Authority (SFA).
The FSA alleged that between September 1996 and January 2006, Merrill Lynch incorrectly reported an estimated 1.2 million transactions in non-UK European equities.
Merrill's questionable transactions showed the firm's status as 'agent' rather than 'principal', because the transaction reporting system was set to report trades from the client's perspective rather than the firm's, according to the FSA.
Merrill only spotted the error in the transaction reporting system in December 2005. This was despite the broker-dealer's increased focus on transaction reporting issues following a private warning from the FSA in November 2002, and subsequent discussions with the FSA about certain transactions in 2004 and 2005.
The broker-dealer violated rule 5.49 of the SFA, which requires a firm to supply the SFA with details about the investment transactions it effects.
In imposing the financial penalty, the FSA took into account relevant factors, including the fact that Merrill acted proactively in reporting the failure to the regulator and that the reporting failure was not deliberate or reckless.
Merrill Lynch reported the transaction failures to the FSA in January 2006, and has co-operated fully with the FSA's investigation.
The firm completed a systems change to correct the error, and has revised the testing mandate to include all mandatory fields.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Basel war on window-dressing may smooth liquidity, at a price
Changes to G-Sib charge could curb year-end repo volatility, but also cut balance sheet capacity
One year on, regulators still want a cure for bank runs
Broad support for higher outflow assumptions on uninsured deposits, but that won’t save insolvent banks
Watchlist and adverse media monitoring solutions 2024: market update and vendor landscape
This Chartis report updates Watchlist monitoring solutions 2022 and focuses on solutions for sanctions (name and transaction) screening and monitoring adverse media and its related elements
Basel Committee reviewing design of liquidity ratios
Focus on LCR and NSFR after Silicon Valley Bank and Credit Suisse, but assumptions may not change
Risk, portfolio margin, regulation: regtech to the rescue
A white paper outlining the complexity of setting the course for risk, margin and regulation
Prop shops recoil from EU’s ‘ill-fitting’ capital regime
Large proprietary trading firms complain they are subject to hand-me-down rules originally designed for banks
Revealed: the three EU banks applying for IMA approval
BNP Paribas, Deutsche Bank and Intesa Sanpaolo ask ECB to use internal models for FRTB
FCA presses UK non-banks to put their affairs in order
Greater scrutiny of wind-down plans by regulator could alter capital and liquidity requirements
Most read
- Basel Committee reviewing design of liquidity ratios
- Breaking out of the cells: banks’ long goodbye to spreadsheets
- Too soon to say good riddance to banks’ public enemy number one