FSA fines Merrill Lynch Intl
The Financial Services Authority (FSA) has fined Merrill Lynch International £150,000 for inaccurate transaction reports to the FSA and the Securities and Futures Authority (SFA).
The FSA alleged that between September 1996 and January 2006, Merrill Lynch incorrectly reported an estimated 1.2 million transactions in non-UK European equities.
Merrill's questionable transactions showed the firm's status as 'agent' rather than 'principal', because the transaction reporting system was set to report trades from the client's perspective rather than the firm's, according to the FSA.
Merrill only spotted the error in the transaction reporting system in December 2005. This was despite the broker-dealer's increased focus on transaction reporting issues following a private warning from the FSA in November 2002, and subsequent discussions with the FSA about certain transactions in 2004 and 2005.
The broker-dealer violated rule 5.49 of the SFA, which requires a firm to supply the SFA with details about the investment transactions it effects.
In imposing the financial penalty, the FSA took into account relevant factors, including the fact that Merrill acted proactively in reporting the failure to the regulator and that the reporting failure was not deliberate or reckless.
Merrill Lynch reported the transaction failures to the FSA in January 2006, and has co-operated fully with the FSA's investigation.
The firm completed a systems change to correct the error, and has revised the testing mandate to include all mandatory fields.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Hopes rise for EU re-entry to UK swaps market
EC says discussions on draft decision softening derivatives trading obligation are ‘advanced’
BoE’s Ramsden defends UK’s ring-fencing regime
Deputy governor also says regulatory reform is coming to the UK gilt repo market
Credit spread risk: the cryptic peril on bank balance sheets
Some bankers fear EU regulatory push on CSRBB has done little to improve risk management
Credit spread risk approach differs among EU banks, survey finds
KPMG survey of more than 90 banks reveals disagreement on how to treat liabilities and loans
Bowman’s Fed may limp on by after cuts
New vice-chair seeks efficiency, but staff clear-out could hamper functions, say former regulators
Review of 2025: It’s the end of the world, and it feels fine
Markets proved resilient as Trump redefined US policies – but questions are piling up about 2026 and beyond
Hong Kong derivatives regime could drive more offshore booking
Industry warns new capital requirements for securities firms are higher than other jurisdictions
Will Iosco’s guidance solve pre-hedging puzzle?
Buy-siders doubt consent requirement will remove long-standing concerns