
Monster.com job database comes under attack by phishers
LOSSES & LAWSUITS
Details of the breach were discovered only after computer security firm Symantec reported on its website that it had found a new kind of trojan, called Infostealer.Monstres, which had gathered a hoard of 1.6 million personal records stolen from Monster.com and had uploaded them to a remote server on a computer in Ukraine. The trojan only attacked the "Monster for Employers" site, the section used by recruiters and human resources personnel to search for potential candidates, which was probably accessed using the stolen credentials of a Monster.com employee.
On discovery of the attack, Symantec informed Monster.com, which disabled the affected accounts and posted a warning on its online security centre that clients were being sent fraudulent job offers in an attempt to gain access to their financial information. Monster.com has not reported the crime to police and no arrests have been made.
The threat is not yet over for Monster.com as the personal data stored in the database - from potentially several hundred thousand, mainly US-based, people - could also be used to steal personal identities and perpetrate financial fraud. The personal details and the Monster.com name made the phishing scam appeared more genuine than those most online consumers have become used to. The victims were also expecting to be contacted by strangers with job offers as a result of signing up with the recruitment site.
In a statement, the data vaulting and security specialist Cyber-Ark said the data leakage could have been avoided if the site had maintained its database in a secure and encrypted format. Calum Macleod, European director for Cyber-Ark, said: "Modern encryption and digital vaulting techniques mean personal information uploaded to a website like Monster.com need only be decrypted when the database is interrogated. Using this approach means the data can be held securely on the web server and, even if hackers succeeded in downloading the files, the fact that they were encrypted would render the data unreadable - and therefore unusable."
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Industry confused by EU’s ‘bingo card’ clearing rules
Uncertainty over definition of representative trades in Emir active account requirement
FDIC scrutinised over move to cover all SVB deposits
Advisory panel questions whether guaranteeing uninsured deposits was necessary to prevent contagion
EBA seeks to tighten up uneven prudent value adjustments
Regulator to consult ‘soon’ on changes to improve consistency of capital deductions
Post-Brexit divergence puts EU subsidiaries on the rack
Banks face choice between higher staffing costs or over-engineered processes at UK headquarters
SEC criticised for belt-and-braces ban on volume-based pricing
Legal experts question need for rules to prevent firms disguising agency trades as proprietary
SEC expected to protect CRT in conflicts of interest rule
Decision could come as early as today; high hopes for credit risk transfer exemption
FRTB managers face hard facts about risk factors
There are ways to reduce the capital charges caused by NMRFs, but they come at a price
SEC official defends delayed dealer registration rule
Regulator says market should be treated like equities, but PTFs warn it will harm market liquidity